Author: Jason Kent
Date: 15:34:42 06/26/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 26, 2005 at 17:52:38, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On June 26, 2005 at 17:08:08, Jason Kent wrote: > >>On June 26, 2005 at 15:58:16, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >> >>>On June 26, 2005 at 15:57:11, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >>> >>>>On June 26, 2005 at 15:34:30, Jason Kent wrote: >>>> >>>> Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. >>>> >>>> 1 CMX Beast : 2585 181 157 14 67.9 % 2456 >>>> 2 CMX Tsunami : 2456 177 177 14 50.0 % 2456 >>>> 3 CMX Milan 2.3 : 2456 177 177 14 50.0 % 2456 >>>> 4 CMX Medusa : 2456 177 177 14 50.0 % 2456 >>>> 5 Shredder 9 UCI : 2453 26 30 448 64.4 % 2350 >>>> 6 CMX Steadfast : 2431 172 209 14 46.4 % 2456 >>>> 7 CMX Schumacher : 2406 102 201 14 42.9 % 2456 >>>> 8 CMX R1X : 2406 102 201 14 42.9 % 2456 >>>> 9 CMX D1Meandros : 2406 161 201 14 42.9 % 2456 >>>> 10 CMX Berean 5.53 : 2406 161 201 14 42.9 % 2456 >>>> 11 CMX Yoda 2.7 : 2380 149 194 14 39.3 % 2456 >>>> 12 CMX D2Alos : 2380 149 194 14 39.3 % 2456 >>>> 13 CMX D1Pyr : 2380 149 194 14 39.3 % 2456 >>>> 14 CM9_Minotaur : 2380 118 194 14 39.3 % 2456 >>>> 15 CMX Cell : 2380 183 194 14 39.3 % 2456 >>>> 16 CMX Vegeta2b : 2354 171 187 14 35.7 % 2456 >>>> 17 CMX Emperor : 2354 211 187 14 35.7 % 2456 >>>> 18 CMX Cobra : 2326 118 181 14 32.1 % 2456 >>> >>>I forgot to add: interesting cross table. >>>How many games are you going to play per match? >>>Kurt >> >> >>Thanks Kurt, >> >>The first round had 10 cycles. This second round will have 14 more cycles >>(total of 24 games per engine). The third round will have 26 cycles (total of >>50 games per engine). >> >>All engines have to maintain 30%, and at the end of each round, the lowest >>performers are removed. >> >>So far I've been impressed with CMX and I think it has made some definate >>improvements over CM9! >> >>Jason > > Hi Jason > Is it not too early to say that CMX is a definite > improvement over CM9? There is so far only one > setting having a positive score vs Shredder 9. > Kurt Considering this is Shredder 9 (the best engine) at a long time control (S9's specialty), I think some of these CMX settings are doing very well. Take a look at CM9 Minotaur; that is one of the better CM9 settings. Yes, it is doing ok, but I don't expect it to finish near the very top. Jason
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.