Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: hydra's blunder or no blunder?

Author: Madhavan

Date: 21:22:18 06/26/05

Go up one level in this thread


On June 26, 2005 at 13:57:57, Terry McCracken wrote:

>On June 26, 2005 at 05:46:02, Günther Simon wrote:
>
>>On June 26, 2005 at 04:18:35, Terry McCracken wrote:
>>
>>>On June 26, 2005 at 03:58:39, Uri Blass wrote:
>>>
>>>>On June 25, 2005 at 20:18:38, Terry McCracken wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On June 25, 2005 at 19:45:53, Uri Blass wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On June 25, 2005 at 19:43:04, Uri Blass wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>[D]2r3k1/4pp1p/3p1bp1/p2P4/R1PB4/1r4P1/1P3P1P/3R2K1 b - - 0 24
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Hydra played Kg7
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Most programs prefer Bxd4 and not Kg7 Bxf6+ Kxf6 Rd2 when it seems that white
>>>>>>>does not lose material.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I wonder if Hydra had a good reason to play Kg7 and Not Bxd4.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Uri
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I know that black centralize the king but the question is if pawn that black can
>>>>>>win with Bxd4 is not more important.
>>>>>
>>>>>I don't think it makes a big difference, White can't prevent the eventual
>>>>>exchange of Bishops. Kg7 imo was a good move as it was centralizing, the Bs were
>>>>>coming off and the b2 pawn history.
>>>>
>>>>The b2 pawn is no hiostory after Kg7 Bxf6+ Kxf6 26.Rd2
>>>>
>>>>The question is what black does after that line.
>>>>
>>>>If black goes for the b2 pawn by 26...Rcb8 then after a possible line like
>>>>Rxa5 Rxb2 Rxb2 Rxb2 Ra3 Rc2 Rf3+ Kg7 Rf4 I do not see the win for black.
>>>>
>>>>26...Rc5 is a possible alternative but I do not see how black win it after a
>>>>move like 27.h4.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Uri
>>>
>>>Hydra saw deeper.
>>
>>LOL running out of arguments?
>>
>>Guenther
>
>Are you just making stupid remarks, to annoy me? It would appear so. You should
>know I never run out of arguments.

he makes stupid remarks to nearly everyone except to programmers who release
their engine that he would test.so far he has tested crappy little engines.

>You're out of line and I would appreciate you adding something to the thread,
>rather than trying to provoke a fight.

Yes,He always wanted to get into fight with every one,I don't know if he has any
attitude problem,or is he always like "this",this means he being so offensive.

>If you want me to provide analysis to back up my position, this isn't the way to
>go about it.

He wouldnt do that,really a hopeless person to deal with,the best way is to
"ignore" him,I did,he stopped fighting.

I know you have provided a lot of opinion on chess programs and test suites.



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.