Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 22:11:19 06/26/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 25, 2005 at 16:28:30, Derek Paquette wrote: >On June 25, 2005 at 16:00:08, Thomas Logan wrote: > >>I think 5.5 -.5 >> >>Poor Adams I am afraid may be throughly discouraged >> >>Its sad >> >>Tom > >It seems to views are slowly becoming a reality, I predict no human can beat >hydra, I've always said that humans were outclassed in chess, its just getting >worse and worse > >Hydra has played over a dozen games vs professional chess players at standard >time control, its FIDE equivalent rating must be what? 3000? Have you noticed Adams is making quirky errors? Have you noticed Hydra too is making some poor choices and Adams misses them? There are people who could beat Hydra, but they would do their homework first. Anand is one of them, and Kasparov could certainly really give this beast a run for its money, but it's unlikely he'll ever play it...too bad. I think they chose Adams for a reason. Now we see that reason.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.