Author: Günther Simon
Date: 00:34:47 06/27/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 27, 2005 at 00:22:18, Madhavan wrote: >On June 26, 2005 at 13:57:57, Terry McCracken wrote: > >>On June 26, 2005 at 05:46:02, Günther Simon wrote: >> >>>On June 26, 2005 at 04:18:35, Terry McCracken wrote: >>> >>>>On June 26, 2005 at 03:58:39, Uri Blass wrote: >>>> >>>>>On June 25, 2005 at 20:18:38, Terry McCracken wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On June 25, 2005 at 19:45:53, Uri Blass wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On June 25, 2005 at 19:43:04, Uri Blass wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>[D]2r3k1/4pp1p/3p1bp1/p2P4/R1PB4/1r4P1/1P3P1P/3R2K1 b - - 0 24 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Hydra played Kg7 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Most programs prefer Bxd4 and not Kg7 Bxf6+ Kxf6 Rd2 when it seems that white >>>>>>>>does not lose material. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>I wonder if Hydra had a good reason to play Kg7 and Not Bxd4. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Uri >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I know that black centralize the king but the question is if pawn that black can >>>>>>>win with Bxd4 is not more important. >>>>>> >>>>>>I don't think it makes a big difference, White can't prevent the eventual >>>>>>exchange of Bishops. Kg7 imo was a good move as it was centralizing, the Bs were >>>>>>coming off and the b2 pawn history. >>>>> >>>>>The b2 pawn is no hiostory after Kg7 Bxf6+ Kxf6 26.Rd2 >>>>> >>>>>The question is what black does after that line. >>>>> >>>>>If black goes for the b2 pawn by 26...Rcb8 then after a possible line like >>>>>Rxa5 Rxb2 Rxb2 Rxb2 Ra3 Rc2 Rf3+ Kg7 Rf4 I do not see the win for black. >>>>> >>>>>26...Rc5 is a possible alternative but I do not see how black win it after a >>>>>move like 27.h4. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Uri >>>> >>>>Hydra saw deeper. >>> >>>LOL running out of arguments? >>> >>>Guenther >> >>Are you just making stupid remarks, to annoy me? It would appear so. You should >>know I never run out of arguments. > >he makes stupid remarks to nearly everyone except to programmers who release >their engine that he would test.so far he has tested crappy little engines. > >>You're out of line and I would appreciate you adding something to the thread, >>rather than trying to provoke a fight. > >Yes,He always wanted to get into fight with every one,I don't know if he has any >attitude problem,or is he always like "this",this means he being so offensive. > >>If you want me to provide analysis to back up my position, this isn't the way to >>go about it. > >He wouldnt do that,really a hopeless person to deal with,the best way is to >"ignore" him,I did,he stopped fighting. > >I know you have provided a lot of opinion on chess programs and test suites. Ignorant little Madhavan, just stay away from things you haven't even read, like you once wanted to do. (Remember this thread is/was about the assessment of chess moves) Terry already admitted his wrong assessment here (1.5 hours after his answer to my post). http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?433711 Guenther
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.