Author: Pablo Ignacio Restrepo
Date: 06:04:27 06/27/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 26, 2005 at 23:35:23, Earl Fuller wrote:
>On June 26, 2005 at 23:24:08, Pablo Ignacio Restrepo wrote:
>
>>On June 26, 2005 at 22:48:33, Earl Fuller wrote:
>>
>>>On June 26, 2005 at 22:33:41, Pablo Ignacio Restrepo wrote:
>>>
>>>>Helo Hydra at 26/06/05 = 4.5 - 0.5 = 4 / 5 = 0.8 x 400 = 320 + 2.742 = 3.062
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Helo Hydra at 26/06/05 = 4.5 - 0.5 = 4 / 5 = 0.8 x 400 = 320 + 2.742 = 3.062
>>>>
>>>>The best chess player has ever been is now Hydra.
>>>>Time to make an engine better than Hydra for everyone who wants to be the more
>>>>important.
>>>>For me Hydra is the new leader and Hydra must have a "star" like a unique best
>>>>of the best.
>>>>If the chess internet clubs has the costumer to put a gold King for the V.I.P
>>>>that are playing in an specific moment into the club, an this is an invitation
>>>>for the fun chess player to be into a club, now, the max important player that
>>>>could have the clubs, is Hydra, of course.
>>>>Congratulations for Hydra team, for everyone human beings that have worked hard
>>>>to make a reality that incredible creature.
>>>>Best,
>>>>Pablo
>>>
>>>Pablo,___:) there still is a match that needs to take place and that is
>>>Shredder vs Hydra______it's a match that must happen. 12 or 16 games at 40/2
>>>Hydra can't claim to be the top dog till it beats the number one SSDF rated
>>>program and that is Shredder.
>>>earl
>>
>>
>> Earl,
>>Are they going to play,"Hydra Vs Shredder"?
>>I would like to see playing to Hydra into Linares.
>>G.M. Adams have made strong strategic series mistakes in the challenger:
>>1. To have played 1.e2e4.
>>2. To have played Ruy Lopez without c7c5 (black move)
>>3. To have played Petrof.
>>4. To have played half or open opening moves.
>>But the score is simple today 4.5. 0.5.
>>I have seen many times Hydra into engines room in playchess. I have played Hydra
>>as a human being many times, and I have discover anything very important> They
>>are working making Hydra better everyday. For example, the antichess, have been
>>studied seriously for Hydra, and now, Hydra at lest must have special books, and
>>I don’t know, but could be special algorithm.
>>Hydra\is running as a project faster than other ones.
>>Best,
>>Pablo
>
>Very intersting Pablo,__but even so, the fact remains that Shredder is the
>number one rated PC chess program in the world and a match between Hydra and
>Shredder would be the "compter match of the century".____
>Hydra is a dragon that must be slain and the only sword out there is Shredder !
>If shredder gets killed,__well, will have to build a bigger sword !___lol
>earl
Hello Earl,
Agreed Earl. In other way, in the Man Vs Machine combat, is time to see other
strategies from Top GM. Time too see a very diferent opening lines.
How must be fight Hydra? Yesterday I watched a great example into engines room
from playchess:
[D]rnbqkbnr/1ppppppp/p7/8/3PP3/8/PPP2PPP/RNBQKBNR b KQkq d3 0 2
[D] 2rq1rk1/1bpnb1pp/p2p4/Pp1Pp3/1P2Pp2/2NP1N1P/3BQPP1/RR4K1 w - - 0 18
[D] 3b2k1/1b3qpp/pN1pn3/Pp2p3/1P2Pp2/3P1N1P/2Q2PP1/4B1K1 b - - 0 32
[Event "60m + 20s, rated"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2005.06.26"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Ares01, Hydra/Scylla-1.06bC"]
[Black "Denderah"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "B00"]
[WhiteElo "2518"]
[Annotator "Restrepo,Pablo"]
[PlyCount "63"]
[EventDate "2005.06.26"]
[EventType "rapid"]
1. e4 {[%emt 0:00:00]} a6 {[%emt 0:00:07]} 2. d4 {[%emt 0:00:00]} b6 {
[%emt 0:00:04]} 3. Nf3 {[%emt 0:00:00]} Bb7 {[%emt 0:00:03]} 4. Bd3 {
[%emt 0:00:00]} e6 {[%emt 0:00:15]} 5. O-O {[%emt 0:00:00]} d6 {[%emt 0:00:09]}
6. d5 {[%emt 0:00:00]} e5 {[%emt 0:00:35]} 7. Qd2 {[%emt 0:00:00]} Be7 {
[%emt 0:00:49]} 8. h3 {[%emt 0:00:00]} Nf6 {[%emt 0:09:40]} 9. Nc3 {
[%emt 0:00:00]} O-O {[%emt 0:01:19]} 10. a4 {[%emt 0:00:00]} Nbd7 {
[%emt 0:02:24]} 11. Qe3 {[%emt 0:00:00]} Nc5 {[%emt 0:04:43]} 12. b4 {
[%emt 0:02:06]} Nxd3 {[%emt 0:00:04]} 13. cxd3 {[%emt 0:01:38]} Nd7 {
[%emt 0:00:25]} 14. a5 {[%emt 0:02:24]} Rc8 {[%emt 0:05:48]} 15. Bd2 {
[%emt 0:02:06]} f5 {[%emt 0:03:10]} 16. Rfb1 {[%emt 0:02:34]} f4 {
[%emt 0:02:17]} 17. Qe2 {[%emt 0:01:21]} b5 {[%emt 0:01:02]} 18. Rc1 {
[%emt 0:01:45]} Qe8 {[%emt 0:03:20]} 19. Rc2 {[%emt 0:00:00]} c5 {
[%emt 0:02:10]} 20. dxc6 {[%emt 0:00:54]} Rxc6 {[%emt 0:00:48]} 21. Rb1 {
[%emt 0:01:12]} Qf7 {[%emt 0:02:02]} 22. Qd1 {[%emt 0:01:13]} Rfc8 {
[%emt 0:00:09]} 23. Rbc1 {[%emt 0:01:56]} Bd8 {[%emt 0:01:49]} 24. Nd5 {
[%emt 0:02:19]} Rxc2 {[%emt 0:00:16]} 25. Rxc2 {[%emt 0:02:05]} Rxc2 {
[%emt 0:01:57]} 26. Qxc2 {[%emt 0:00:22]} Nf8 {[%emt 0:01:07]} 27. Nb6 {
[%emt 0:00:41]} Ne6 {[%emt 0:01:03]} 28. Be1 {[%emt 0:01:09]} Kh8 {
[%emt 0:02:12]} 29. Bc3 {[%emt 0:01:17]} Kg8 {[%emt 0:02:00]} 30. Be1 {
[%emt 0:01:18]} Kh8 {[%emt 0:03:16]} 31. Bc3 {[%emt 0:01:03]} Kg8 {
[%emt 0:00:27]} 32. Be1 {(Lag: Av=0.88s, max=1.5s) [%emt 0:01:25]} 1/2-1/2
[D] rnbqkbnr/1ppppppp/p7/8/3PP3/8/PPP2PPP/RNBQKBNR b KQkq d3 0 2
I want to be sincere. For me the next Top GMs that have played against
Computers, Kasparov, Kramnik, and Adams, are not leaders in Mn Vs Machine
Knowlodge, and his strategic computer concepts, have been very poor.
Best,
Pablo
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.