Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 11:24:15 06/27/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 27, 2005 at 03:34:47, Günther Simon wrote: >On June 27, 2005 at 00:22:18, Madhavan wrote: > >>On June 26, 2005 at 13:57:57, Terry McCracken wrote: >> >>>On June 26, 2005 at 05:46:02, Günther Simon wrote: >>> >>>>On June 26, 2005 at 04:18:35, Terry McCracken wrote: >>>> >>>>>On June 26, 2005 at 03:58:39, Uri Blass wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On June 25, 2005 at 20:18:38, Terry McCracken wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On June 25, 2005 at 19:45:53, Uri Blass wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On June 25, 2005 at 19:43:04, Uri Blass wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>[D]2r3k1/4pp1p/3p1bp1/p2P4/R1PB4/1r4P1/1P3P1P/3R2K1 b - - 0 24 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Hydra played Kg7 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Most programs prefer Bxd4 and not Kg7 Bxf6+ Kxf6 Rd2 when it seems that white >>>>>>>>>does not lose material. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>I wonder if Hydra had a good reason to play Kg7 and Not Bxd4. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Uri >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>I know that black centralize the king but the question is if pawn that black can >>>>>>>>win with Bxd4 is not more important. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I don't think it makes a big difference, White can't prevent the eventual >>>>>>>exchange of Bishops. Kg7 imo was a good move as it was centralizing, the Bs were >>>>>>>coming off and the b2 pawn history. >>>>>> >>>>>>The b2 pawn is no hiostory after Kg7 Bxf6+ Kxf6 26.Rd2 >>>>>> >>>>>>The question is what black does after that line. >>>>>> >>>>>>If black goes for the b2 pawn by 26...Rcb8 then after a possible line like >>>>>>Rxa5 Rxb2 Rxb2 Rxb2 Ra3 Rc2 Rf3+ Kg7 Rf4 I do not see the win for black. >>>>>> >>>>>>26...Rc5 is a possible alternative but I do not see how black win it after a >>>>>>move like 27.h4. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Uri >>>>> >>>>>Hydra saw deeper. >>>> >>>>LOL running out of arguments? >>>> >>>>Guenther >>> >>>Are you just making stupid remarks, to annoy me? It would appear so. You should >>>know I never run out of arguments. >> >>he makes stupid remarks to nearly everyone except to programmers who release >>their engine that he would test.so far he has tested crappy little engines. >> >>>You're out of line and I would appreciate you adding something to the thread, >>>rather than trying to provoke a fight. >> >>Yes,He always wanted to get into fight with every one,I don't know if he has any >>attitude problem,or is he always like "this",this means he being so offensive. >> >>>If you want me to provide analysis to back up my position, this isn't the way to >>>go about it. >> >>He wouldnt do that,really a hopeless person to deal with,the best way is to >>"ignore" him,I did,he stopped fighting. >> >>I know you have provided a lot of opinion on chess programs and test suites. > >Ignorant little Madhavan, just stay away from things you haven't even read, >like you once wanted to do. (Remember this thread is/was about the assessment >of chess moves) > >Terry already admitted his wrong assessment here (1.5 hours after his >answer to my post). > >http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?433711 > >Guenther Yes, I made an error and corrected it, but your approach was wrong. Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.