Author: Uri Blass
Date: 20:46:21 06/27/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 27, 2005 at 22:22:31, Robin Smith wrote: >On June 27, 2005 at 02:54:38, Drexel,Michael wrote: > >>On June 26, 2005 at 21:29:30, K. Burcham wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>I assume Chrilly wrote the Code for the Nimzo program. >>>If this is true then what were his results from year to year when working with >>>chess code against his competitors, Ed, Robert, etc... >>>Was Chrilly winning some of the time, most of the time? >>>How many times was Nimzo world champion? >>>Is Chrilly an IM, GM..? >> >>Chrilly is a weak chess player. > >True; but then most strong chess programmers are weak chess players. > >>He has also no respect for human GMs at all. > >Then why is a human GM on the Hydra team? What support can you give for this >claim? > >>>How come all of a sudden this Chrilly has a program that some say beats >>>shredder, all of the worlds top programmers, and now can beat the number 7 super >>>GM in the world. >> >>It´s very easy. Start a match between Fruit 2.1 on a 2 GHz against Shredder 9 on >>200 Mhz. Shredder wouldn´t have a chance. >> >>This Hardware will always produce very strong chess in open positions. > >Yes. It seems to do pretty well in semi-open positions as well. Maybe time will >tell about closed positions (if Hydra ever allows them). > >>Crafty on that Hardware would smash Adams as well. > >Adams would have won all 6 games by forfeit, Crafty won't run on that hardware. >:-) > >>Chrilly is IMO a worse chess programmer than SMK or Amir Ban or Frans Morsch. > >SMK, Amir Ban, and Frans Morsch (and others) are excellent programmers. However >Chrilly has produced the strongest chess playing entity ever created, so your >strong statement needs strong proof. I think that the claim that chrilly has produced the strongest chess playing identity was not proved. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.