Author: Madhavan
Date: 03:43:14 06/28/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 28, 2005 at 06:25:23, Amir wrote: >On June 28, 2005 at 05:19:06, Madhavan wrote: > >>On June 27, 2005 at 23:47:36, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On June 27, 2005 at 14:04:41, William Sorin wrote: >>> >>>>After reading the Archives you get the impression That humans played some kind >>>>of Super Qualtity Chess that programs were far from Understanding and matching. >>>>It was said That All us Dumb people don't understand how strong a Grandmaster >>>>really is, Yet I just witnessed Hydra Tear Michael Adams to Shreds game after >>>>game, and wondered if In fact Adams was even a Grandmaster at all!! >>> >>> >>>Not sure who you mean. But I can think of several GM players that are really >>>difficult opponents for computers. Roman is certainly one. Shirov is another. >>>Even Bill Lombardy (the last time I talked with him anyway, which was 3-4 years >>>ago at least) was a "computer problem". >> >>>There are others as well... >> >>Anand and Topalov,ofcourse. > >No proof that Anand and Topalov are good anti-comp players, especially Topalov >isn't. I'd direct you to this link http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?434025 what's anti-computer players?phew utter nonsense do you have any webpage about anti-computer players?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.