Author: Uri Blass
Date: 04:20:28 06/28/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 28, 2005 at 06:27:00, Madhavan wrote: > >I decide to post this for someone to express their ultimate point of view with >respect to Man Vs Machine > >> Why do you believe that. Anand has never played >> vs Hydra I think. In my opinion, top GM's are >> not best choice to fight vs strong computer >> programs. I still believe that a 2200 Elo player >> understanding chess programs will do better than >> all the professional top GM's. >> Kurt > >Kurt,what you said was utter nonsense. >2200 ELO player?Anand will beat 100 games to 0 against any 2200 player,you bet. I do not believe it. There are 2200 players that can draw part of the games with anand. > >Top GM is the best choice for playing top programs,How do you know if "someone" >is fit for playing Hydra,assuming that "someone"claims that he is anti-computer >opponent. Arnold hasidovsky(player with rating near 2200) drew against 3 computers in the israeli league. > >you too can claim "I'm an anti-comp player,I can destroy any computer,I've >expereience playing with all chess programs,I understand its working" > >thats blah blah ofcourse. > >If you want to see the real MAN vs Machine,then Top GM vs Top Machine is the >contest quite fairly [people's opinion] I do not think that you are right and I think that we should give opportunity also to weaker players. If you do not want to see many 2200 players who claim that they are anti-computer experts then there should be some money risk for people who lose 6-0 or 5.5-0.5. Hydra may decide about open challange when humans pay 1000$ for participating in a match of 6 games and get 500$ for every draw and 1500$ for every win. > >Anand is the only best player in the world currently,after Kasparov announced >his retirement.He did well in both blitz and standard tournament. > >Adams is a kid who has no chess experience and makes a lot mistakes in all >phases of game,takes too much time to find a dumb move and makes a dumbest >move,duh!comes with totally unprepared,gets 1 draw and later says "Hydra is the >monster" > >http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=2476 >see the link,and wait for Adams's blah blah speech,he should be explaining his >poor perfomance rather than oppponent's strength. > >Don't speak nonsense like "a beginner is fit to play Hydra" 2200 player is not a beginner.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.