Author: George Tsavdaris
Date: 05:38:25 06/28/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 28, 2005 at 06:27:00, Madhavan wrote: > >I decide to post this for someone to express their ultimate point of view with >respect to Man Vs Machine > >> Why do you believe that. Anand has never played >> vs Hydra I think. In my opinion, top GM's are >> not best choice to fight vs strong computer >> programs. I still believe that a 2200 Elo player >> understanding chess programs will do better than >> all the professional top GM's. >> Kurt > >Kurt,what you said was utter nonsense. >2200 ELO player?Anand will beat 100 games to 0 against any 2200 player,you bet. I also disagree with Kurt but there are better ways to express it than yours:-) I believe that a 2200 player against current Hydra on 32 CPU's, will lose 6-0 or 5.5-0.5. But this 6-0 will happen 8-9 times out of 10 series of 6-games, while the 5.5-0.5 only 1. If the 2200 would be lucky enough to be at this single time he would have a successful result....... > >Top GM is the best choice for playing top programs,How do you know if "someone" >is fit for playing Hydra,assuming that "someone"claims that he is anti-computer >opponent. A top GM is the best choice but he should change his style a bit. Becoming a little anti-computer is critical.........And i don't mean to play exclusively with an anti-comp strategy, but only simple things like: a closed opening, trading Queens, prefer quiet positions, creating invinsible(for comps) attacks,etc........ > >you too can claim "I'm an anti-comp player,I can destroy any computer,I've >expereience playing with all chess programs,I understand its working" > >thats blah blah ofcourse. > >If you want to see the real MAN vs Machine,then Top GM vs Top Machine is the >contest quite fairly [people's opinion] > >Anand is the only best player in the world currently,after Kasparov announced >his retirement.He did well in both blitz and standard tournament. > >Adams is a kid who has no chess experience and makes a lot mistakes in all >phases of game,takes too much time to find a dumb move and makes a dumbest >move,duh!comes with totally unprepared,gets 1 draw and later says "Hydra is the >monster" > >http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=2476 >see the link,and wait for Adams's blah blah speech,he should be explaining his >poor perfomance rather than oppponent's strength. > >Don't speak nonsense like "a beginner is fit to play Hydra" >you can believe beginner and novice are all fit,you can hear from them saying "I >know how to beat chess machines and how it works" >no one knows hydra's opening lines,then how come there are some anti-computer >players,I hear some player names who play anti-comp chess? > >someone who claims that he is anti-computer chess expert should be given >potatoes to peel instead of medal. > >I don't agree with you if you say anti-comp GM is the best choice,forget them as >they have'nt shown any good ranking and games in Men's championship. >decide taking world number #1 Anand or Toplaov.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.