Author: Pablo Ignacio Restrepo
Date: 08:21:37 06/28/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 28, 2005 at 10:06:19, Rick Hagen wrote: > >Greetings all, > >"In a moment of clarity" it looked to me a good idea to organize a man-machine >match on the playchess server. > >First humans that come to mind are Pablo (Father) and Eduard. >Two more volunteers needed. >Think of the man-machine match in Bilbao. >Those of you who think you can do better than those clueless GM's can volunteer. >Proposed Engines: >Shredder 9 >Fritz 8 >Hiarcs 9 >Junior 9 >There are sensible reasons to replace one of the above with Fruit 2.1 and >Pro-Deo of course... > >Proposed TC: 90m+30s (open to suggestions) > >What do you think? > >Lightbulb regards, >RickH On June 28, 2005 at 10:06:19, Rick Hagen wrote: > >Greetings all, > >"In a moment of clarity" it looked to me a good idea to organize a man-machine >Match on the play chess server. > >First humans that come to mind are Pablo (Father) and Eduard. >Two more volunteers needed. >Think of the man-machine match in Bilbao. >Those of you who think you can do better than those clueless GM's can volunteer. >Proposed Engines: >Shredder 9 >Fritz 8 >Hiarcs 9 >Junior 9 >There are sensible reasons to replace one of the above with Fruit 2.1 and >Pro-Deo of course... > >Proposed TC: 90m+30s (open to suggestions) > >What do you think? > >Lightbulb regards, >RickH Hello Rick I want to be sincere and humbble: "Engines are mutch better than me and Hydra is the strong chess player have ever been". But, I am ready to the fight. But the combat must has 3 more important things: 1. To have a man/woman from a Federation in each place of the Internet combat making safe the not assistance of a human or a computer. 2. To play against the standard modes of the engines not modified. 3. To be sure that each game is going to be into the news. About 3-line explanation: The history of Man Vs machines commentaries by experts, that I have seen on my life, like Kasparov, Kramnik, Adams, etc, “have been usually ridiculous and plus of false ignorance,” because, just a few, or close to nobody in the Top lines, have had the force to write just a little clear about the other face of the truth and put the examples of Top engines mistakes. A little example. How does have been possible that my two draws against Hydra have been ignoring by the News and or the experts comentors (Except Eduard)? Actually there are international conspirators against the antichess style and against the chess players that are playing antichess. A simple example> a. ICC, have banned to me just because I played antichess beating engines, and its punish everyone that play antichess against engines. b. Adams has played suicide chess against Hydra. c. Kasparov, and Kramnik after them matches against Fritz and Junior, have said that the engines they played are too strong, and have not write one simple line about Fritz and Junior Weakness’, being a protagonist of a great chess marketing. d. And many more sad examples, like the today chess base expert’s concepts about state of art of chess computers. But look you this > All they are getting into ridiculous atmosphere. Every day is taking more power the ANTICHESS SISMA, against the paradigms of the prehistoric chess, or classic chess, or orthodox chess, lastone the most beautiful of the chess history, but the more stupid way to make combat to the computer engines. Best, Pablo
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.