Author: Juan Pablo Naar C.
Date: 13:32:04 06/28/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 28, 2005 at 07:20:28, Uri Blass wrote: >On June 28, 2005 at 06:27:00, Madhavan wrote: > >> >>I decide to post this for someone to express their ultimate point of view with >>respect to Man Vs Machine >> >>> Why do you believe that. Anand has never played >>> vs Hydra I think. In my opinion, top GM's are >>> not best choice to fight vs strong computer >>> programs. I still believe that a 2200 Elo player >>> understanding chess programs will do better than >>> all the professional top GM's. >>> Kurt >> >>Kurt,what you said was utter nonsense. >>2200 ELO player?Anand will beat 100 games to 0 against any 2200 player,you bet. > >I do not believe it. >There are 2200 players that can draw part of the games with anand. > > >> >>Top GM is the best choice for playing top programs,How do you know if "someone" >>is fit for playing Hydra,assuming that "someone"claims that he is anti-computer >>opponent. > >Arnold hasidovsky(player with rating near 2200) drew against 3 computers in the >israeli league. > >> >>you too can claim "I'm an anti-comp player,I can destroy any computer,I've >>expereience playing with all chess programs,I understand its working" >> >>thats blah blah ofcourse. >> >>If you want to see the real MAN vs Machine,then Top GM vs Top Machine is the >>contest quite fairly [people's opinion] > >I do not think that you are right and I think that we should give opportunity >also to weaker players. > >If you do not want to see many 2200 players who claim that they are >anti-computer experts then there should be some money risk for people who lose >6-0 or 5.5-0.5. > >Hydra may decide about open challange when humans pay 1000$ for participating in >a match of 6 games and get 500$ for every draw and 1500$ for every win. > >> >>Anand is the only best player in the world currently,after Kasparov announced >>his retirement.He did well in both blitz and standard tournament. >> >>Adams is a kid who has no chess experience and makes a lot mistakes in all >>phases of game,takes too much time to find a dumb move and makes a dumbest >>move,duh!comes with totally unprepared,gets 1 draw and later says "Hydra is the >>monster" I just hate that someone judges a HUMAN for playing only 6 games. Adams isn't BAD, is just that Hydra is too GOOD. And that "kid" would beat you in any match, and Hydra IS a monster. >>http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=2476 >>see the link,and wait for Adams's blah blah speech,he should be explaining his >>poor perfomance rather than oppponent's strength. >> >>Don't speak nonsense like "a beginner is fit to play Hydra" > >2200 player is not a beginner.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.