Author: gerold daniels
Date: 15:20:43 06/28/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 28, 2005 at 11:21:37, Pablo Ignacio Restrepo wrote: hello Pablo when will you be writting a program with your type of playing. gerold. >On June 28, 2005 at 10:06:19, Rick Hagen wrote: > >> >>Greetings all, >> >>"In a moment of clarity" it looked to me a good idea to organize a man-machine >>match on the playchess server. >> >>First humans that come to mind are Pablo (Father) and Eduard. >>Two more volunteers needed. >>Think of the man-machine match in Bilbao. >>Those of you who think you can do better than those clueless GM's can volunteer. >>Proposed Engines: >>Shredder 9 >>Fritz 8 >>Hiarcs 9 >>Junior 9 >>There are sensible reasons to replace one of the above with Fruit 2.1 and >>Pro-Deo of course... >> >>Proposed TC: 90m+30s (open to suggestions) >> >>What do you think? >> >>Lightbulb regards, >>RickH > >On June 28, 2005 at 10:06:19, Rick Hagen wrote: > >> >>Greetings all, >> >>"In a moment of clarity" it looked to me a good idea to organize a man-machine >>Match on the play chess server. >> >>First humans that come to mind are Pablo (Father) and Eduard. >>Two more volunteers needed. >>Think of the man-machine match in Bilbao. >>Those of you who think you can do better than those clueless GM's can volunteer. >>Proposed Engines: >>Shredder 9 >>Fritz 8 >>Hiarcs 9 >>Junior 9 >>There are sensible reasons to replace one of the above with Fruit 2.1 and >>Pro-Deo of course... >> >>Proposed TC: 90m+30s (open to suggestions) >> >>What do you think? >> >>Lightbulb regards, >>RickH > > >Hello Rick > >I want to be sincere and humbble: "Engines are mutch better than me and Hydra is >the strong chess player have ever been". > >But, I am ready to the fight. > >But the combat must has 3 more important things: > >1. To have a man/woman from a Federation in each place of the Internet combat >making safe the not assistance of a human or a computer. >2. To play against the standard modes of the engines not modified. >3. To be sure that each game is going to be into the news. > >About 3-line explanation: >The history of Man Vs machines commentaries by experts, that I have seen on my >life, like Kasparov, Kramnik, Adams, etc, “have been usually ridiculous and plus >of false ignorance,” because, just a few, or close to nobody in the Top >lines, have had the force to write just a little clear about the other face of >the truth and put the examples of Top engines mistakes. > >A little example. >How does have been possible that my two draws against Hydra have been ignoring >by the News and or the experts comentors (Except Eduard)? > >Actually there are international conspirators against the antichess style and >against the chess players that are playing antichess. >A simple example> >a. ICC, have banned to me just because I played antichess beating engines, and >its punish everyone that play antichess against engines. >b. Adams has played suicide chess against Hydra. >c. Kasparov, and Kramnik after them matches against Fritz and Junior, have said >that the engines they played are too strong, and have not write one simple line >about Fritz and Junior Weakness’, being a protagonist of a great chess >marketing. >d. And many more sad examples, like the today chess base expert’s concepts about >state of art of chess computers. > >But look you this > All they are getting into ridiculous atmosphere. Every day >is taking more power the ANTICHESS SISMA, against the paradigms of the >prehistoric chess, or classic chess, or orthodox chess, lastone the most >beautiful of the chess history, but the more stupid way to make combat to the >computer engines. > >Best, >Pablo
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.