Author: Madhavan
Date: 19:48:23 06/28/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 28, 2005 at 08:38:25, George Tsavdaris wrote: >On June 28, 2005 at 06:27:00, Madhavan wrote: > >> >>I decide to post this for someone to express their ultimate point of view with >>respect to Man Vs Machine >> >>> Why do you believe that. Anand has never played >>> vs Hydra I think. In my opinion, top GM's are >>> not best choice to fight vs strong computer >>> programs. I still believe that a 2200 Elo player >>> understanding chess programs will do better than >>> all the professional top GM's. >>> Kurt >> >>Kurt,what you said was utter nonsense. >>2200 ELO player?Anand will beat 100 games to 0 against any 2200 player,you bet. > > I also disagree with Kurt but there are better ways to express it than yours:-) > > I believe that a 2200 player against current Hydra on 32 CPU's, will lose 6-0 >or 5.5-0.5. But this 6-0 will happen 8-9 times out of 10 series of 6-games, >while the 5.5-0.5 only 1. If the 2200 would be lucky enough to be at this single >time he would have a successful result....... > >> >>Top GM is the best choice for playing top programs,How do you know if "someone" >>is fit for playing Hydra,assuming that "someone"claims that he is anti-computer >>opponent. > > A top GM is the best choice but he should change his style a bit. Becoming a >little anti-computer is critical.........And i don't mean to play exclusively >with an anti-comp strategy, but only simple things like: a closed opening, >trading Queens, prefer quiet positions, creating invinsible(for comps) >attacks,etc........ > >> >>you too can claim "I'm an anti-comp player,I can destroy any computer,I've >>expereience playing with all chess programs,I understand its working" >> >>thats blah blah ofcourse. >> >>If you want to see the real MAN vs Machine,then Top GM vs Top Machine is the >>contest quite fairly [people's opinion] >> >>Anand is the only best player in the world currently,after Kasparov announced >>his retirement.He did well in both blitz and standard tournament. >> >>Adams is a kid who has no chess experience and makes a lot mistakes in all >>phases of game,takes too much time to find a dumb move and makes a dumbest >>move,duh!comes with totally unprepared,gets 1 draw and later says "Hydra is the >>monster" >> >>http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=2476 >>see the link,and wait for Adams's blah blah speech,he should be explaining his >>poor perfomance rather than oppponent's strength. >> >>Don't speak nonsense like "a beginner is fit to play Hydra" >>you can believe beginner and novice are all fit,you can hear from them saying "I >>know how to beat chess machines and how it works" >>no one knows hydra's opening lines,then how come there are some anti-computer >>players,I hear some player names who play anti-comp chess? >> >>someone who claims that he is anti-computer chess expert should be given >>potatoes to peel instead of medal. >> >>I don't agree with you if you say anti-comp GM is the best choice,forget them as >>they have'nt shown any good ranking and games in Men's championship. >>decide taking world number #1 Anand or Toplaov.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.