Author: Vikrant Malvankar
Date: 21:13:06 06/28/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 28, 2005 at 16:32:04, Juan Pablo Naar C. wrote: >On June 28, 2005 at 07:20:28, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On June 28, 2005 at 06:27:00, Madhavan wrote: >> >>> >>>I decide to post this for someone to express their ultimate point of view with >>>respect to Man Vs Machine >>> >>>> Why do you believe that. Anand has never played >>>> vs Hydra I think. In my opinion, top GM's are >>>> not best choice to fight vs strong computer >>>> programs. I still believe that a 2200 Elo player >>>> understanding chess programs will do better than >>>> all the professional top GM's. >>>> Kurt >>> >>>Kurt,what you said was utter nonsense. >>>2200 ELO player?Anand will beat 100 games to 0 against any 2200 player,you bet. >> >>I do not believe it. >>There are 2200 players that can draw part of the games with anand. >> >> >>> >>>Top GM is the best choice for playing top programs,How do you know if "someone" >>>is fit for playing Hydra,assuming that "someone"claims that he is anti-computer >>>opponent. >> >>Arnold hasidovsky(player with rating near 2200) drew against 3 computers in the >>israeli league. >> >>> >>>you too can claim "I'm an anti-comp player,I can destroy any computer,I've >>>expereience playing with all chess programs,I understand its working" >>> >>>thats blah blah ofcourse. >>> >>>If you want to see the real MAN vs Machine,then Top GM vs Top Machine is the >>>contest quite fairly [people's opinion] >> >>I do not think that you are right and I think that we should give opportunity >>also to weaker players. >> >>If you do not want to see many 2200 players who claim that they are >>anti-computer experts then there should be some money risk for people who lose >>6-0 or 5.5-0.5. >> >>Hydra may decide about open challange when humans pay 1000$ for participating in >>a match of 6 games and get 500$ for every draw and 1500$ for every win. >> >>> >>>Anand is the only best player in the world currently,after Kasparov announced >>>his retirement.He did well in both blitz and standard tournament. >>> >>>Adams is a kid who has no chess experience and makes a lot mistakes in all >>>phases of game,takes too much time to find a dumb move and makes a dumbest >>>move,duh!comes with totally unprepared,gets 1 draw and later says "Hydra is the >>>monster" > >I just hate that someone judges a HUMAN for playing only 6 games. Adams isn't >BAD, is just that Hydra is too GOOD. And that "kid" would beat you in any match, >and Hydra IS a monster. Bt Anand or Topalov can beat that monster and Adams can't. > >>>http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=2476 >>>see the link,and wait for Adams's blah blah speech,he should be explaining his >>>poor perfomance rather than oppponent's strength. >>> >>>Don't speak nonsense like "a beginner is fit to play Hydra" >> >>2200 player is not a beginner.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.