Author: gerold daniels
Date: 05:07:53 06/29/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 29, 2005 at 02:12:15, Dann Corbit wrote: >On June 28, 2005 at 22:47:33, gerold daniels wrote: > >>On June 28, 2005 at 08:10:24, Amir wrote: >> >>>On June 28, 2005 at 06:43:31, Vikrant Malvankar wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Also what Pablo achieved on Playchess.com and numerous Engines beating Hydra was >>>>at fast time control and are irrelevent at longer time controls against Hydra. >>> >>>Comps are stronger than humans at faster time control, so if someone does well >>>against comps at faster time control, he would do even better at slower time >>>control. >> >>Hi Amir, got to disagree on this one. a lot of people can play and beat computer >>on fast time control. they play for draw and for win on time. >>most of the chess players i have seen and the games that have been posted >>were play very poor. most players i know that play for time wins cannot play >>a good classical chess game. > >But if you look at it statistically, you will see that the faster the game, the >higher the computed Elo value will be for machines, and opposite for humans. > true. >Correspondence chess is (possibly) the last bastion for human chess supremacy, >and that must eventually fall also.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.