Author: Richard Pijl
Date: 12:43:54 06/29/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 29, 2005 at 14:20:32, Eelco de Groot wrote: >On June 29, 2005 at 10:23:49, Richard Pijl wrote: > >>The following position occurred in an ICC game between Amateur and the Baron >>[D]2r5/p2nnkNp/1pq1p1pP/3pPp2/2rP4/P1P3Q1/3B1PP1/R4RK1 b - - >>To my surprise Baron didn't hesitate to sac the exchange on c3 and won the game, >>probably partly because Amateur didn't handle the endgame too well (exchange of >>queens was probably not a good idea). >I'm not sure the exchange sac is entirely correct, Richard? I'm not sure either. The Baron didn't have a convincing winning score. >after 22..Rxc3 Vulcan Q1e expects 23.Qg5 which fails low but then is still at >+2.5 for White I'm not surprised that this might be the case. Black is material down. But when counting as a human, the knight on g7 isn't doing much and going nowhere. So I guess +2.5 is a bit overoptimistic. Richard.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.