Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: interview with Michael Adams posted on chessbase

Author: Andreas Guettinger

Date: 14:34:28 06/30/05

Go up one level in this thread


On June 30, 2005 at 17:12:16, Robin Smith wrote:

>On June 30, 2005 at 16:08:32, Andreas Guettinger wrote:
>
>>On June 30, 2005 at 11:34:18, Evgeny Shu wrote:
>>
>>>http://chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=2485
>>
>>
>>Now this surprises me a bit:
>>
>>"I wasn’t really concerned about that possibility. In any case it would be
>>impossible for me to tell, because Hydra plays a very different game to any
>>other computer that I ever saw. Even in these six games it actually played
>>differently to anything I saw in its own previous games, so it’s not easy to
>>judge. But no, I don’t have any suspicions about human intervention. That’s not
>>something that concerned me."
>>
>>A replayed the matches live on Hiarcs 9.6 and Fruit 2.1 on my 2 computers, and I
>>would say above 95% of Hydras moves were suggested by at least one of them.
>>Especially Fruit did very well in predicting Hydras moves.
>>Therefore the sentence "Hydra palys a very different game to any other computer
>>that I ever saw" leaves me a bit out in the cold.
>>
>>regrads
>>Andy
>
>
>Hi Andy,
>
>Several people have mentioned this same basic idea:
>
>1) "A group of PC programs can predict most of the moves of Hydra"
>
>therefore
>
>2) "PCs are about as strong as Hydra".
>
>The trouble is #2 doesn't follow from #1. As a correpsondence player who has
>used compter programs extensively for analysis, I can say with certainty that
>even with as few as 2 PC programs, if you could always pick the strongest move
>between these two program's suggestions, the result is far stronger than either
>program alone. You see a similar thing with test positions; program A solves
>positions 1,2,3,4 and 5 lightning fast but is horribly slow or completely fails
>to solve positions 6,7,8,9 and 10. Program B might be just the opposite, slow on
>the first 5 and fast on the others. The trick is knowing which program to
>believe if you don't already know the answer.
>
>-Robin

I didn't want to say anything about the strength between PC programs and Hydra.
I just can't see haw anybody can say

"Hydra plays a very different game to any other computer that I ever saw"

As to the strength between PC programs and Hydra you mentioned. I personnally
believe any PC program on decent hardware would have performed (as good or even
better) as Hydra.
This is of course my personal oppinion.

regrads
Andy



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.