Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 17:29:42 06/30/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 30, 2005 at 16:08:32, Andreas Guettinger wrote: >On June 30, 2005 at 11:34:18, Evgeny Shu wrote: > >>http://chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=2485 > > >Now this surprises me a bit: > >"I wasn’t really concerned about that possibility. In any case it would be >impossible for me to tell, because Hydra plays a very different game to any >other computer that I ever saw. Even in these six games it actually played >differently to anything I saw in its own previous games, so it’s not easy to >judge. But no, I don’t have any suspicions about human intervention. That’s not >something that concerned me." > >A replayed the matches live on Hiarcs 9.6 and Fruit 2.1 on my 2 computers, and I >would say above 95% of Hydras moves were suggested by at least one of them. >Especially Fruit did very well in predicting Hydras moves. >Therefore the sentence "Hydra palys a very different game to any other computer >that I ever saw" leaves me a bit out in the cold. > >regrads >Andy It's a little hyperbole and a lot of exaggeration. :) I had crafty analyzing most of the games live on ICC and it as well as most other programs predicted Hydras moves _very_ accurately...
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.