Author: Pablo Ignacio Restrepo
Date: 20:05:32 06/30/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 30, 2005 at 12:58:17, Rob Basham wrote: >On June 30, 2005 at 12:42:09, Günther Simon wrote: > >>On June 30, 2005 at 12:11:46, Rob Basham wrote: >> >>>On June 30, 2005 at 12:02:18, Günther Simon wrote: >>> >>>>On June 30, 2005 at 11:40:31, Pablo Ignacio Restrepo wrote: >>>> >>>>>[D]r1bqkb1r/pp1n1pp1/2p1Nn1p/8/2BP4/5N2/PPP2PPP/R1BQK2R b KQkq - 0 8 >>>>> >>>> >>>>This was already played dozens of times. >>>>(Hint: only checking CB books is not very analytical) >>>> >>>>Guenther >> >> >>>All my programs play....Nh3, >>>not Nxe6. >>> >>>regards >>> >>>Rob >> >>Rob, a question: >> >>What has being a 'novelty' to do with what your programs play? ;) >>A novelty actually is a move, which wasn't played yet by Humans >>in tournaments, if your programs or your comp books >>don't play nor know this move is irrelevant. >> >>(BTW even that all your program's never play this might be wrong, >>because we don't know how much analysis time you used with them) >> >>If you look in a decent database you will see that this move was >>played dozens of times in the last 20 years. >> >>Regards, >>Guenther > >Well, Pablo had a question mark by the move, so I thought I would check it out. > >Even if played by expert humans, I always like to see what computers do with >it......:-) > >regards > >Rob Hello Rob Agree. Some times I am studing chess in infinite analisis, looking the opening books. Many times the engines have a diferent answer as first in its evaluation. In the same way, the knight sacrifice, I belive is good or bad by itself across the engine evaluation. Best, Pablo
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.