Author: Bo Persson
Date: 05:04:41 07/01/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 30, 2005 at 05:26:51, Madhavan wrote: >Are you implying Deep Blue did solve the game of chess? No, but IBM sure does! :-) They have already beaten the world champion, probably the strongest player ever. Now what? Beat him again (yawn) or lose the rematch (catastrophe!)? Or play against someone weaker and win (double-yawn) or lose that match (and the PR guys sure to get fired)? Why not quit while you're ahead? They did! >What happened to Deep Blue?IBM had lost interest in chess years back?issit? The special chess boards are supposedly stored in their boxes in a closet. The rest of the computer was delivered to its customer. According to Hsu, the match replaced the usual burn-in test performed on new machines! That was their chance to get access to the latest and greatest. >Chess is solved by Deep Blue doesnt stand true,as there will never be a computer >to solve chess,Hydra still makes minor mistakes in its evaluation,Deep Blue has >made a heck lot of mistakes against kasparov,when did DB nearly solve he >game?Did it play against any other program?Who is the programmer? Who said it was true? This is IBM's marketing department talking. Since when does truth and marketing have anything in common? Bo Persson
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.