Author: Otello Gnaramori
Date: 13:27:09 07/01/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 01, 2005 at 14:25:23, Drexel,Michael wrote: >Don´t spout Nonsense here. >Hydra is a "strategical Patzer" like all the other machines. I'm just observing some facts , specialized machines like Hydra did crush a strong GM that did his best against this monster...if you say that Hydra is a strategical patzer, Michael Adams and other people doesn't say so...the machine did play as a god of chess for them. That single game doesn't say nothing to me , I trust more a GM than your opinion...with all the respect for your opinion. w.b.r. Otello >>From Adams interview at chessbase >>... >>"I think it proves that Hydra is a much stronger ‘player’ than any other >>computer in the world. We may not be able to measure its strength in Elo, but it >>is huge. I also suspect Hydra is stronger than any other human opponent. Okay, >>it has to be proved in the future, but this is my impression at the moment and I >>suspect it is accurate. I mean from my point of view I don’t think I played >>terribly. I did my best and it just wasn’t good enough." >> >> >>w.b.r. >>Otello
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.