Author: Uri Blass
Date: 16:41:13 07/01/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 01, 2005 at 14:25:23, Drexel,Michael wrote: >On July 01, 2005 at 13:41:05, Otello Gnaramori wrote: > >>On July 01, 2005 at 09:18:09, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >> >>>Since my perfect chessmachine ROLF played only 75% of the HYDRA moves against >>>Adams, you can see how far away HYDRA is still from perfect play. That is why >>>it's still making sense if more GM play show events. >> >>It's a path near to perfect, perfection is a "chimera" , but it's stronger than >>strongest humans listening to Mr. Adams words...that is why it's so damn >>difficult to beat: > >Don´t spout Nonsense here. >Hydra is a "strategical Patzer" like all the other machines. >Just a couple of minutes ago I saw a game from it. >White had a draw by repetition in this game despite of the opening 1.a3,2.b3?, >but Shredder was even more a stupid than Hydra and lost. > >White could even win this game with 19.Rxd6!. An exchange sacrifice which leads >to a strategical won position. I saw this move immediately. strategical won position? I do not understand. Can you explain how did you get the consequence that white is winning? Note that based on fruit Rxd6 is a good move but this conclusion is only result of deep search. OLIVIER-EVAN,S - Ares01,H, 10m + 10s, rated rapid 2005 [D]rn1r2k1/p5pp/1pRbp2q/3pNpn1/3P1N2/PP1QPP2/1B4PP/5RK1 w - - 0 1 Analysis by Fruit 2.1: 19.Ra1 Bxe5 -+ (-2.29) Depth: 1/10 00:00:00 19.Rb1 Bxe5 -+ (-2.25) Depth: 1/10 00:00:00 19.Rfc1 Bxe5 20.dxe5 Nxc6 21.Rxc6 µ (-1.23) Depth: 1/10 00:00:00 19.Rcc1 = (0.00) Depth: 1/12 00:00:00 19.Rc2 Bxe5 20.dxe5 ± (0.81) Depth: 1/12 00:00:00 19.Rc2 Nd7 ± (0.79) Depth: 2/12 00:00:00 19.Rc2 Nd7 20.Nc6 Bxf4 21.exf4 ² (0.47) Depth: 3/12 00:00:00 19.Rc2 Nd7 20.Nc6 Bxf4 21.exf4 ² (0.47) Depth: 4/12 00:00:00 19.Rc2 Nd7 20.Nc6 Rdc8 21.Re1 ² (0.50) Depth: 5/12 00:00:00 19.Rc2 Bxe5 20.dxe5 Nd7 21.Bd4 Rac8 22.Rfc1 ² (0.40) Depth: 6/20 00:00:00 51kN 19.Rc2 Bxe5 20.dxe5 Nd7 21.Bd4 Nf7 22.Qc3 Nc5 23.Bxc5 bxc5 ² (0.33) Depth: 7/20 00:00:00 87kN 19.Rc2 Bxe5 20.dxe5 Nd7 21.Bd4 Nf7 22.Qc3 Nc5 23.Bxc5 bxc5 ² (0.33) Depth: 8/23 00:00:00 161kN 19.Rc2 Bxe5 20.dxe5 Nd7 21.Bd4 Nf7 22.Qc3 g5 23.Nd3 Rac8 ² (0.38) Depth: 9/23 00:00:01 368kN 19.Rc2 Nd7 20.Nc6 Rdc8 21.Rfc1 Kh8 22.Qa6 Qh4 23.Qb7 Bxf4 24.exf4 ² (0.35) Depth: 10/27 00:00:01 1291kN 19.Rc2 Bxe5 20.dxe5 Nd7 21.Bd4 Nf7 22.Rc7 Rac8 23.Qc2 Nc5 24.Rxa7 Ne4 ² (0.38) Depth: 11/28 00:00:04 3312kN 19.Rc2 Nf7 20.Nxf7 Kxf7 21.Re1 Kg8 22.Kh1 Nd7 23.Rc6 Nf8 24.g3 Rac8 25.Rec1 Rxc6 26.Rxc6 Bxf4 27.exf4 ² (0.31) Depth: 12/38 00:00:12 10290kN 19.Rc2 Nf7 20.Nxf7 Kxf7 21.Rfc1 Bxf4 22.exf4 Qxf4 23.Qe2 Qd6 24.Rc7+ Kg8 25.Rc8 Kf7 26.R1c7+ Rd7 27.Rc2 Rd8 ² (0.31) Depth: 13/38 00:00:19 17236kN 19.Rc2 Nd7 20.Nc6 Re8 21.Qa6 Nb8 22.Nxb8 Rexb8 23.Rfc1 Qh4 24.g3 Qh6 25.Rc8+ Rxc8 26.Rxc8+ Rxc8 27.Qxc8+ Bf8 ² (0.38) Depth: 14/42 00:01:01 54012kN 19.Rc2 Nd7 20.Nc6 Re8 21.Qa6 Nb8 22.Nxb8 Rexb8 23.Rfc1 Qf6 24.Rc6 Rd8 25.a4 Qe7 26.Nd3 Qf6 ² (0.42) Depth: 15/42 00:01:34 84167kN 19.Rc2 Nd7 20.Nc6 Re8 21.Qa6 Nb8 22.Nxb8 Rexb8 23.Rfc1 Qf6 24.Rc6 Rd8 25.a4 Qe7 26.Nd3 Qd7 27.Qb5 ² (0.46) Depth: 16/44 00:03:11 171134kN 19.Rc2 Nd7 20.Qb5 Nf8 21.Rc6 Nf7 22.g3 Nxe5 23.dxe5 Be7 24.b4 Bg5 25.Rc7 Bxf4 26.exf4 Qh5 27.Kg2 Rac8 28.Rfc1 Rxc7 29.Rxc7 ² (0.45) Depth: 17/50 00:09:48 523889kN 19.Rc2 Nd7 20.Qb5 Nf8 21.Rc6 Nf7 22.g3 Qg5 23.Nxf7 Kxf7 24.Qa6 Kg8 25.Re1 Qe7 26.Kh1 Nd7 27.Qb7 g5 28.Nh3 ² (0.47) Depth: 18/50 00:18:15 958862kN 19.Rc2 Nd7 20.Qb5 Nf8 21.Rc6 Nf7 22.g3 Qf6 23.Kg2 Qe7 24.b4 Bxe5 25.dxe5 Rac8 26.Rfc1 Rxc6 27.Qxc6 g5 28.Nh5 Ng6 29.Nf6+ Kh8 ² (0.40) Depth: 19/51 00:35:17 1852594kN 19.Rxd6 Rxd6 20.Qc3 Na6 21.b4 b5 22.a4 Rdd8 23.axb5 Rdc8 24.Nc6 Kh8 25.bxa6 e5 26.dxe5 Rxc6 27.Qd3 Rac8 28.Bd4 Rxa6 29.Qxf5 ² (0.70) Depth: 19/57 00:43:18 2302916kN (, 02.07.2005) Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.