Author: Pablo Ignacio Restrepo
Date: 20:47:19 07/02/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 02, 2005 at 21:24:14, Terry McCracken wrote: >On July 02, 2005 at 21:10:48, Pablo Ignacio Restrepo wrote: > >> >>Hello. >> >>I have some questions for chess computer programmers and human beings brain >>medics >> >>What is the difference in one evaluation between a human being brain and chess >>computer? >> >>I have been wining many times 15%-55% to engines playing what I have named … >>antichess. >> >>I wonder. Is it possible to play that against a strong human being brain? >> >>What do you think? Finally who is strongest…? Hydra or the human being? >> >>Best, >> >>Pablo >> >> >> >> >No, the human mind is very different from a machine, and the strategy you use >against programs simply won't work against grandmasters, or even master/expert >players. > >There are things in chess that are easy for humans and hard for current >programs. Hydra (may) be the exception. > >So what nullifies a machine may in fact help your human opponent. He or she will >understand what you're doing and a machine won't. > >Is Hydra stronger then all humans? This is yet to be proven. There are some >players who without anti-computer chess may still draw or even win a match, but >not many, that is certain. > >With anti-computer play, well, I don't know, as I haven't seen Hydra deal with >it yet but it may draw it, but don't count on too many wins with this technique. > >Terry Hello Terry. Thannk you very mutch for youtr ideas. Agree !! Best Pablo Note. I have been close to take draw playing antichess against my few games I have played G.Ms. Could I finally take a draw ?> Look the game against G.M. Seraiwan. Look that at lest 34 moves he was far to the victorie.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.