Author: Tord Romstad
Date: 07:52:21 07/03/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 03, 2005 at 01:28:56, Eric Oldre wrote: >King Safety is the part of latista's evaluation that I'm >most worried about. Sometimes it gives a really high score >when it shouldn't, and also the low scores when it's own >king is in deep trouble. > >looking at the static evaluations of each position of the >game, In this game it seemed to do a decent job of properly >evaluating the attack. but maybe others have an opinion too. > >Here Latista gave a score of 46 for the whites king attack >[d]r1bk1r2/ppp1nBb1/3q2Qp/8/3n4/2B5/PPP2PPP/RN2R1K1 w - - 0 25 Glaurung 0.2.4 with the default king safety settings gives 87 centipawns for white's attack. >The highest the evaluation ever came was in this position where >white's king attack reached 72 centipawns. > >[d]r7/p2k4/1p2bq2/1N1p1r2/8/4Q3/PP1R1PPP/4R1K1 w - - 2 38 And here, Glaurung gives 1.53 centipawns for white's king attack. Tord
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.