Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 10:05:16 07/03/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 03, 2005 at 13:00:23, Jorge Pichard wrote:
The problem is that Glaurung forgot to castle or doesn't know how to castle
under Arena 1.1, it could had avoided being Mated.
Jorge
>
>[Event "Arena tournament"]
>[Site "CARLOS"]
>[Date "2005.07.03"]
>[Round "1"]
>[White "Pharaon"]
>[Black "Glaurung"]
>[Result "1-0"]
>[Time "12:51:58"]
>[TimeControl "900"]
>[SetUp "1"]
>[FEN "rkrbnqbn/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RKRBNQBN w KQkq - 0 1 "]
>[Termination "normal"]
>[PlyCount "7"]
>[WhiteType "program"]
>[BlackType "program"]
>
>1.Ng3 {(Nh1g3 f7f5 f2f4 Nh8g6 Ne1d3 Bg8e6 e2e4 f5xe4 Ng3xe4 Qf8f5 Qf1f3 Be6xa2+)
>-0.01/10 18} f5 {(f7f5 f2f4 c7c5 Ne1d3 c5c4 Nd3e5 d7d6 Ne5f3 Nh8g6 Nf3d4 Bd8a5
>Nd4xf5
>Ba5xd2) -0.01/13 32} 2.Nd3 {(Ne1d3 c7c6 f2f4 Bd8a5 c2c3 Nh8g6 Nd3c5 Kb8c7 Bd1c2
>Ne8d6)
>-0.04/10 22} f4 {(f5f4 Ng3e4 d7d5 Ne4c3 d5d4 Nc3b5 e7e5 f2f3 Nh8g6 c2c4 c7c6
>Nb5a3)
>+0.28/12 25} 3.Nc5 {(Nd3c5 Ne8f6 Ng3h5 Qf8e8 Nh5xf4 e7e5 Nf4h3 d7d6 Nc5b3 Nh8g6
>f2f4
>Bg8d5 f4xe5) +0.02/11 21} Bc4 {(Bg8c4 Ng3e4 d7d6 d2d3 Bc4g8 Nc5b3 e7e5 c2c4
>Bg8e6
>Bd1c2) +0.33/10 37} 4.Nxd7# {(Nc5xd7+) +M1/35 2} {Mate} 1-0
>
>
>
>>Hi Jorge,
>>
>>Thanks for testing my engine! Nice to see that somebody actually uses the
>>FRC version.
>>
>>On July 03, 2005 at 11:33:25, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>
>>>I noticed that Gothmog is very aggressive, its style of play is suitable for FRC
>>>or Chess960, since it attacks the kingside like no other FRC engine, and it is
>>>very tactical too.
>>
>>It is very possible that you are right (although the number of games is
>>of course so low that Gothmog could just have been lucky). In FRC games,
>>the engines usually find themselves in murky, tactically complicated and
>>positionally ugly positions right out of the opening. A great degree
>>of positional sophistication is often not needed; just developing the
>>pieces actively and throwing them wildly against the opponent's king is
>>likely to work well. This is precisely what Gothmog is good at.
>>
>>Another factor which may explain the good results for Gothmog is that Gothmog
>>is relatively weak in the endgame. FRC puts the endgame a bit further away,
>>which should improve Gothmog's chances a little.
>>
>>You may also want to try the experimental FRC version of Glaurung, my new
>>engine. The source code is available from:
>>
>>http://www.math.uio.no/~romstad/glaurung/g024-frc-src.tar.gz
>>
>>Unfortunately I cannot yet provide a Windows executable, because I don't
>>run Windows. For the same reason, the program is completely untested.
>>There are no FRC compatible GUIs for Mac OS X.
>>
>>If your hypothesis is right, Glaurung should also perform relatively
>>better in FRC. It is almost as aggressive as Gothmog, and it plays
>>clearly better than Gothmog in normal chess.
>>
>>Tord
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.