Author: Peter Kasinski
Date: 11:50:28 07/03/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 03, 2005 at 14:42:28, Graham Banks wrote: >On July 03, 2005 at 11:11:47, Peter Kasinski wrote: > >>Is a new version of King behind this? >> >>Any comments on how worthwile the difference from earlier versions? >> >> >>thanks! >>PK > >CM10th Default is stronger than CM9000 Default. >CM10th does not handle either its own or opposing passed pawns as well as it >should, but apart from this, it's general allround play is more balanced. > >Graham. Thank you. Is there a change in the way it handles its own endgame tablebases?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.