Author: Peter Kasinski
Date: 16:39:52 07/03/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 03, 2005 at 15:40:44, John Merlino wrote: >On July 03, 2005 at 14:50:28, Peter Kasinski wrote: > >>On July 03, 2005 at 14:42:28, Graham Banks wrote: >> >>>On July 03, 2005 at 11:11:47, Peter Kasinski wrote: >>> >>>>Is a new version of King behind this? >>>> >>>>Any comments on how worthwile the difference from earlier versions? >>>> >>>> >>>>thanks! >>>>PK >>> >>>CM10th Default is stronger than CM9000 Default. >>>CM10th does not handle either its own or opposing passed pawns as well as it >>>should, but apart from this, it's general allround play is more balanced. >>> >>>Graham. >> >>Thank you. Is there a change in the way it handles its own endgame tablebases? > >No, that's still the same. > >And I agree with everything Graham said. The engine is more balanced, and the >new engine at the default settings is somewhat stronger than the engine in >CM9000 (reasonable estimates are between 20-40 points). > >However, there is still some more testing needed to determine if the best >user-created CM10 settings are equally better than the best CM9 settings. > >jm Thank you
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.