Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 18:18:43 07/04/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 04, 2005 at 20:17:03, Uri Blass wrote: >On July 04, 2005 at 20:11:59, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>On July 04, 2005 at 05:19:16, Reinhard Scharnagl wrote: >> >>>Hi friends of moder chess, >>> >>>have a look at: http://f51.parsimony.net/forum204700/ >>> >>>Reinhard. >> >>That is great now I can continue buying an excellent program that is the best at >>standard chess and it has potential to be the best at Chess960 or FRC. Another >>great program that I will also get as soon as is get released is Hiarcs-FRC. >> >> >>PS: If Shredder-FRC and Hiarcs-FRC take 1st and 2nd place, then there will be 22 >>programs left competing for 3rd place :-) >> >>Jorge > >I am not sure if hiarcs with a single processor is better than programs like >Deep Sjeng that support more than one processor. > >Uri Another question is Programs that used to be good at standard chess are not automatically the best at Chess960 or FRC. Here is a good example Pharaon 3.3is probably 50 rating points higher at standard chess than Gothmog or Glaurung: Engine Score Ph Gl S-B 1: Glaurung-frc 15.5/29 ······ 1011000=011001111=0100101=011 209.25 2: Pharaon 13.5/29 0100111=100110000=1011010=100 ······ 209.25 29 of 30 games played Name of the tournament: Arena tournament Site/ Country: CARLOS, United States Level: Tournament Game in 15 Minutes Hardware: AMD Athlon(tm) Processor 1202 MHz with 255 MB Memory Operating system: Microsoft Windows XP Professional Service Pack 2 (Build 2600) PGN-File: C:\Program Files\Arena\Arena.pgn Website: E-Mail Address:
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.