Author: Graham Banks
Date: 21:31:58 07/04/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 04, 2005 at 16:25:59, CrayBlitz wrote: >On July 04, 2005 at 00:56:38, Graham Banks wrote: > >>On July 03, 2005 at 17:05:58, CrayBlitz wrote: >> >>>Hi to all ! >>>I have a results very interesting match. SmarThink 0.18a (R=267).uci - Fruit 2.1 >>>(default) Fruit played with own book. Smarthink had Perfect 7.0 and used TB - >>>3,4. Time control : 60+15. Hardware: P 2530, hash = 512MB >>> >>>Smarthink - Fruit 2005 >>> >>> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 >>>1 SmarThink 0.18a[lpha] 1 1 0 1 ½ 1 1 0 1 1 1 ½ 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 ½ 10.5/20 >>>2 Fruit 2.1 0 0 1 0 ½ 0 0 1 0 0 0 ½ 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 ½ 9.5/20 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>SmarThink played much well at the beginning initially match, but afterwards >>>Fruit has shown the excellent play and has nearly done draw in match. >>>SmarThink, like Movei, underrates the attack on king and bad plays blitz. But in >>>the other he plays much powerfully. I am surprised. >>> >>>The games, certainly, little :)) , but that you think about this? >> >> >>SmarThink shows a lot of promise and you've summed it up quite well. However I >>wouldn't have expected such a close result against Fruit 2.1. Over a 20 game >>spread, results like this can happen though. If you were to play another 20 game >>match, you might get a markedly different result. >> >>Graham. > >Hi >I think as well as I am going to to conduct the new matches with such condition, >but with other enemy. I shall write about this here. :)) > >Say please about best settings for CM 10000 at time control: 60+15 The top CM10th settings are too close to call really. At this early stage I'd go with any of: Behemoth, Milan 2.3, Beast or Berean 5.53. Graham
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.