Author: Graham Banks
Date: 21:38:05 07/04/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 05, 2005 at 00:31:58, Graham Banks wrote: >On July 04, 2005 at 16:25:59, CrayBlitz wrote: > >>On July 04, 2005 at 00:56:38, Graham Banks wrote: >> >>>On July 03, 2005 at 17:05:58, CrayBlitz wrote: >>> >>>>Hi to all ! >>>>I have a results very interesting match. SmarThink 0.18a (R=267).uci - Fruit 2.1 >>>>(default) Fruit played with own book. Smarthink had Perfect 7.0 and used TB - >>>>3,4. Time control : 60+15. Hardware: P 2530, hash = 512MB >>>> >>>>Smarthink - Fruit 2005 >>>> >>>> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 >>>>1 SmarThink 0.18a[lpha] 1 1 0 1 ½ 1 1 0 1 1 1 ½ 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 ½ 10.5/20 >>>>2 Fruit 2.1 0 0 1 0 ½ 0 0 1 0 0 0 ½ 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 ½ 9.5/20 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>SmarThink played much well at the beginning initially match, but afterwards >>>>Fruit has shown the excellent play and has nearly done draw in match. >>>>SmarThink, like Movei, underrates the attack on king and bad plays blitz. But in >>>>the other he plays much powerfully. I am surprised. >>>> >>>>The games, certainly, little :)) , but that you think about this? >>> >>> >>>SmarThink shows a lot of promise and you've summed it up quite well. However I >>>wouldn't have expected such a close result against Fruit 2.1. Over a 20 game >>>spread, results like this can happen though. If you were to play another 20 game >>>match, you might get a markedly different result. >>> >>>Graham. >> >>Hi >>I think as well as I am going to to conduct the new matches with such condition, >>but with other enemy. I shall write about this here. :)) >> >>Say please about best settings for CM 10000 at time control: 60+15 > > >The top CM10th settings are too close to call really. At this early stage I'd go >with any of: Behemoth, Milan 2.3, D! Meandros, Beast or Berean 5.53. > >Graham
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.