Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 02:35:27 07/05/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 05, 2005 at 03:36:12, Tord Romstad wrote: >On July 04, 2005 at 21:18:43, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>Another question is Programs that used to be good at standard chess are not >>automatically the best at Chess960 or FRC. Here is a good example Pharaon 3.3is >>probably 50 rating points higher at standard chess than Gothmog or Glaurung: > >Almost 100 points stronger than Gothmog, probably. I haven't seen any data >which indicates that it is 50 points stronger than Glaurung, though. We don't >yet >know how Glaurung 0.2.4 compares to Pharaon 3.3, but I suspect they are very >close in playing strength. > >Tord If you need over 1000 games to prove anything, than any program withing a close rating of less than 100 points can cause a major dissapointment to another in a tourney where they only meet a maximun of two games, like the coming tourney of the Computer Chess Chess9860 Championship. Jorge
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.