Author: Uri Blass
Date: 03:10:20 07/05/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 05, 2005 at 03:36:12, Tord Romstad wrote: >On July 04, 2005 at 21:18:43, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>Another question is Programs that used to be good at standard chess are not >>automatically the best at Chess960 or FRC. Here is a good example Pharaon 3.3is >>probably 50 rating points higher at standard chess than Gothmog or Glaurung: > >Almost 100 points stronger than Gothmog, probably. I haven't seen any data >which indicates that it is 50 points stronger than Glaurung, though. We don't >yet >know how Glaurung 0.2.4 compares to Pharaon 3.3, but I suspect they are very >close in playing strength. > >Tord I think that things may be also dependent on time control and on the question if you use ponder off or ponder on. For some reason Glaurung does not do well in Leo's tournament. I know that old 0.2.2j is used there but older version(0.2.1) promoted to the king class with ponder off and faster time control than WBEC and it is logical to expect 0.2.2j to be stronger than 0.2.1 Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.