Author: Madhavan
Date: 05:41:25 07/05/05
Its better to release a standalone engine with its own GUI,when a programmer gives protocol support for engines,his programming economy decreases. It's either of 2 reasons,programmer will obtain less amount or testers do tests reporting result and detecting bugs. player 'd too become a tester,sometimes he gets bored always being engine's victim. I'd like to know if there are anyone who play chess with chessbase and who don't test engines? I happen to know that there are many people out there who dont know what's computer chess or that computer program can play with another program by protocol.that would be chessmaster buyers. Ironically if you ask someone "do you know Deep Junior"? "Shredder"? probable answer is "I don't know,what it it?" If you ask some CD buyers "Do you know chessmaster" most probably the response from them would turn out to be positive you bet. Do you agree with the idea of releasing chess program that should come with its own GUI? so.is vincent planning to exactly do this?or also Bruce?may be. having more chess GUI's seems to be interesting,we have enough chess engines.what do you expect to have?many chess engine,some clones can be detected. I don't understand why anyone would reject this idea?
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.