Author: Uri Blass
Date: 06:55:57 07/05/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 05, 2005 at 09:34:40, Tord Romstad wrote: >On July 05, 2005 at 06:10:20, Uri Blass wrote: > >>I think that things may be also dependent on time control and on the question if >>you use ponder off or ponder on. > >Pondering probably has some importance. Glaurung's time management doesn't >work quite as well with ponder on. This would be easy to fix, but I've been >too lazy so far. > >I think Glaurung's strength no longer depends very much on the time control, >though. The CEGT results are not too different from the various blitz rating >lists. > >>For some reason Glaurung does not do well in Leo's tournament. > >I think it does quite OK. It is near the middle of the very strong 1st >division, and I see no reason to complain about that. I expected it to do better and fight for promotion considering the fact that 0.2.1 is stronger than Movei based on the last queen class when 0.2.1 promoted to the king class when Movei Demoted to the rook class. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.