Author: Telmo C. Escobar
Date: 15:13:13 07/06/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 06, 2005 at 11:22:32, Bigler wrote: >On July 06, 2005 at 11:14:58, Telmo C. Escobar wrote: > >>On July 06, 2005 at 09:43:45, Bigler wrote: >> >>>Hi all, >>> >>>What is according to you the best move after the following : >>>1.d4 Nf6 2.Bg5 Ne4 3.Bf4 c5 4.f3 Qa5 5.c3 Nf6 6.Nd2 cxd4 7.Nb3 Qd8 >>>8.cxd4 d5 9.e3 e6 >>> >>>10.g4 seems interesting but after 10...g5 black seems to have an interesting >>>position. >>> >>>10.Nh3 >>>10.Rc1 >>>10.Bd3 >>> >>>What I am waiting for is not just let the machine run on the current 10 move and >>>give me analyses but to have an extensive analyse of the position. >>> >>>Maybe you could also give me link to interent website where we can post position >>>for analyses ?! >>> >>>thanks for your help & Best regards >> >> >> It could be wise to start from the assumption that White may be already in >>serious positional trouble. His pawn structure is slightly inferior, and both >>his knights have poor prospects: KN suffers because it has no access to f3 from >>which it could press on e5. The other knight is probably even worse at b3. >> >> From this evaluation, my advice is: don't look for aggressive plans and moves. >> If, as I feel, Black has the upper hand, White has to be in guard about >>possible Black aggressive plans. >> >> If a I was Black, I'd be happy completing my development, placing a few pieces >>in their natural positions. My main doubt should be about the dark squared >>bishop: my instinct brings me to put it immediately on d6 in order to prepare >>for e6-e5 (opening the "e" file would be untasteful for White due to his >>weakness at e3). Yet, after an eventual Bf8-d6, White could swap bishops and >>immediately play f3-f4. So it coulb be better for Black to play simply his >>bishop in e7, castle short and think about opening the centre only after >>completing his development. >> >> It goes without saying that White is not lost already and, in practice, winning >>with Black demmands some expertise in positional play. >> >> Telmo > >Hi Telmo, >thanks for your statement. > >I do not really agree that black is a little better. >But instead of talking with personnal feeling I would prefer to give concret >anaylses. > >rgds There is no thing like concrete analysis in a vacuum. Human players start analysing from an evaluation, and only analyse until they get a definite indication about plans and moves. In the given position there are no tactical problems to be solved my means of "I play this-he plays that" brute calculations. I have given reasons to think that Black is a little better, and also a -sketchy- plan: Be7, 0-0, Nc6, then maybe Re8-Bd6, etc. Also your observation about "personal feelings" are not adequate. My remark about White knights is objective: imagine both knights in their natural positions, f3 and c3: KN at f3 controls e5 so making harder for Black to prepare e6-e5; QN at c3 controls d5 so making even harder for black to go for e6-e5 because the e6 pawn has the duty to defend its d5 brother. Telmo
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.