Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Has Ehlvest now an eternal pin at move 49?

Author: Kurt Utzinger

Date: 00:02:10 07/07/05

Go up one level in this thread


On July 06, 2005 at 17:09:25, Otello Gnaramori wrote:

>On July 06, 2005 at 16:31:00, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>>      Yes, but it did not happen because
>>      GM Ehlvest blundered heavily
>
>
>It's not so an heavy blunder i.m.h.o. , humans are not perfect anyway, some
>people was pointing at elhvest as the adams avenger, as the anticomputer
>master...but we know that silicon beasts are merciless on any little mistake.
>Let's follow Dann's advice: people against people, silicon against silicon.
>
>w.b.r.
>Otello

     You are right: it's not a heavy blunder. The
     position was perhaps lost in any case. But it
     was a good fighting game of GM Ehlvest, my respect.
     Kurt



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.