Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 11:14:36 07/07/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 07, 2005 at 13:56:04, Dann Corbit wrote: >On July 07, 2005 at 05:05:50, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: > >>On July 05, 2005 at 14:37:46, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>The logfile does not consider the depth on-chip at the leaves. About 6 plies >>>more. So consider it really to be 16-18 plies. >> >>This is quite simply completely wrong, and contradicts what Hsu and Campbell >>published. >> >>http://sjeng.org/ftp/deepblue.pdf > >I read the paper. I was referring to this: >"This typically results in 4- or 5-ply searches plus quiescence in middlegame >positions and somewhat deeper searches in endgames." > >I did not see the contradiction. Can you please point it out ot me? The first number in the logs is the combined depth (excluding quiescence, but nobody counts that). The nominal depth was around 12 ply for the combined search, not 16-18. -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.