Author: Pablo Ignacio Restrepo
Date: 06:54:00 07/08/05
Go up one level in this thread
Good Morning Uri. I am agreed. Best regard, Pablo On July 08, 2005 at 05:58:30, Uri Blass wrote: >On July 07, 2005 at 23:30:38, Pablo Ignacio Restrepo wrote: > >>Shredder 9.02 UCI: 17.1 ply; 478kN/s AuthenticAMD 2167MHz, (1 threads) >> >>What about that? >> >>I am not a master,not tittle player, not federation, not publication, just >>playing for fun, as a hobby player, and as a simple amateur. > >Shredder blundered > >Here is example for one of shredder's mistakes but it was probably too late to >win the game at that point. > >It seems that fruit has evaluation of open files when shredder does not have it. > >Father - Pizza Margherita, Rated game, 15m + 0s 2005 >[D]2r5/4k2r/3bp3/1p1p1p2/p1pP1Ppp/P1P1P1P1/1P2R2P/4BRK1 b - - 0 1 > >Analysis by Fruit 2.1: > >28...hxg3 29.hxg3 > µ (-1.07) Depth: 1/2 00:00:00 >28...hxg3 29.hxg3 Kf6 > µ (-1.33) Depth: 2/6 00:00:00 >28...hxg3 29.hxg3 Kf6 30.Bd2 > µ (-1.11) Depth: 3/8 00:00:00 >28...hxg3 29.Bxg3 Kf6 30.Kg2 Kg6 > µ (-1.27) Depth: 4/12 00:00:00 >28...hxg3 29.Bxg3 Kf6 30.Kg2 Kg6 31.Rd2 > µ (-1.24) Depth: 5/12 00:00:00 >28...hxg3 29.Bxg3 Kf6 30.Kg2 Kg6 31.Rd2 Kf6 > µ (-1.22) Depth: 6/14 00:00:00 8kN >28...hxg3 29.Bxg3 Kf7 30.Kg2 Kf6 31.Rd2 Kg6 32.Rg1 > µ (-1.21) Depth: 7/15 00:00:00 22kN >28...hxg3 29.Bxg3 Kf7 30.Kg2 Kg6 31.Rd2 Ra8 32.Rg1 Rc8 > µ (-1.21) Depth: 8/15 00:00:00 34kN >28...hxg3 29.Bxg3 Kd7 30.Kg2 Kc6 31.Rd2 Kb6 32.Rg1 Rg8 33.Rf1 > µ (-1.23) Depth: 9/20 00:00:01 83kN >28...hxg3 29.Bxg3 Kf6 30.Kg2 Kg6 31.Rd2 Ra8 32.Rg1 Kf6 33.Rf1 Rc8 > µ (-1.22) Depth: 10/20 00:00:01 150kN >28...hxg3 29.Bxg3 Kf6 30.Kg2 Rch8 31.Rd2 Ra8 32.Rg1 Rc8 33.Rf1 Kg6 34.Rg1 > µ (-1.21) Depth: 11/20 00:00:01 278kN >28...hxg3 29.Bxg3 Kd7 30.Kg2 Kc6 31.Rh1 Rch8 32.Rg1 Rg8 33.Rc2 Kb6 34.Rd2 Rc8 > µ (-1.21) Depth: 12/20 00:00:01 581kN >28...hxg3 29.Bxg3 Kd7 30.Kg2 Kc6 31.Rh1 Rch8 32.Rg1 Rg8 33.Rc2 Kb6 34.Re2 Rc8 >35.Rd2 > µ (-1.21) Depth: 13/25 00:00:01 891kN >28...hxg3 29.Bxg3 Kd7 30.Kg2 Kc6 31.Rh1 Rch8 32.Rg1 Rg8 33.Rc2 Kb6 34.Re2 Ra8 >35.Rd2 Rc8 > µ (-1.21) Depth: 14/25 00:00:01 1462kN >28...hxg3 29.hxg3 Rch8 30.Rg2 Kf6 31.Kf2 Rh2 32.Rfg1 R2h3 33.Bd2 R3h6 34.Ke2 >R6h7 35.Kf2 Kg6 36.Rd1 > µ (-1.16) Depth: 15/30 00:00:04 5781kN >28...hxg3 29.hxg3 Rch8 30.Rg2 Kf6 31.Kf2 Rh2 32.Rfg1 R2h3 33.Ke2 R3h7 34.Bd2 Kg6 >35.Rf1 Rh2 36.Rxh2 Rxh2+ 37.Rf2 > µ (-1.14) Depth: 16/30 00:00:07 9413kN >28...hxg3 29.hxg3 Rch8 30.Rg2 Kf6 31.Kf2 Rh2 32.Rfg1 R2h3 33.Ke2 Kg7 34.Bf2 R3h7 >35.Rf1 Kf6 36.Rc1 Kg6 37.Rd1 > µ (-1.14) Depth: 17/35 00:00:11 14593kN >28...hxg3 29.hxg3 Rch8 30.Rg2 Kf6 31.Kf2 Rh2 32.Rfg1 R2h3 33.Ke2 Kg7 34.Bf2 R3h7 >35.Rf1 Kf6 36.Be1 Rh6 37.Bf2 Rh3 > µ (-1.14) Depth: 18/37 00:00:17 23833kN >28...hxg3 29.hxg3 Rch8 30.Rg2 Kf6 31.Kf2 Rh2 32.Rfg1 R2h3 33.Ke2 Kg7 34.Bf2 R3h7 >35.Rf1 Kg6 36.Be1 Rh3 37.Bd2 Rh2 38.Rxh2 Rxh2+ 39.Rf2 > µ (-1.14) Depth: 19/39 00:00:27 36804kN >28...hxg3 29.hxg3 Rch8 30.Rg2 Kf6 31.Kf2 Rh2 32.Rfg1 R2h3 33.Ke2 Kg7 34.Bf2 R3h7 >35.Rf1 Kg6 36.Be1 Kf7 37.Bd2 Rh2 38.Rxh2 Rxh2+ 39.Rf2 > µ (-1.14) Depth: 20/43 00:00:41 56177kN >28...hxg3 29.hxg3 Rch8 30.Rg2 Kf6 31.Kf2 Rh2 32.Rfg1 R2h3 33.Ke2 Kg7 34.Bf2 R3h7 >35.Rf1 Kf6 36.Rd1 Rh3 37.Ra1 Kg6 38.Rag1 R3h7 39.Rd1 > µ (-1.14) Depth: 21/45 00:01:09 93135kN > >(, 08.07.2005) > >Fruit after h3 gives only 0.71 pawns for black and it suggest that fruit's >evaluation is better than Shredder. > >Another test position when Fruit also fails is the following position > > >[D]2r4r/4kp1p/3bp3/1p1p2p1/p1pP1P2/P1P1P1P1/RP1B3P/R5K1 b - - 0 1 > >I think that g4 is a blunder. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.