Author: Madhavan
Date: 07:11:09 07/08/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 08, 2005 at 08:29:23, M Hurd wrote: >On July 08, 2005 at 07:41:43, Madhavan wrote: > >>On July 08, 2005 at 07:34:50, Thomas Logan wrote: >> >>>Current standing ongoing match >>> >>>THOMAS-KBZT8WLT, 120'/40+60'/20+30' 0 >>> >>> 12345678 >>>1 Fruit 2.1 10101½1½ 5.0/8 >>>2 Shredder 9 01010½0½ 3.0/8 >>> >>>books Shredder -shredder9.ctg >>>Fruit - df8.ctg and own book >>>200 meg hash per side,5 man tablebases >>> >>>Tom >> >>According to your test with 8 games,Fruit seems to be strong,but according to >>others shredder outperfoms fruit. > >Hello > >113 games have been played by the CEGT where Fruit 2.1 scored 45.1% against >Shredder 9. > >See here : http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/CEGT0507.html > >However I have seen some scores here where someone used Fruit 2.1 DF where Fruit >scored above 50% against Shredder. Although how the DF settings will do against >other engines is unclear. > >Using standard settings Fruit 2.1 rates at 2713 from 2,003 games at 40/40, which >is 37 elo behind shredder 9 on 2750. > >Therefore I agree that Fruit is a strong engine. you are not getting my point clearly?where did i say "Fruit is not a strong engine" I just said Shredder is ahead of fruit in many tourneys. therefore what you post doesnt relate to my sub thread post. >Regards > >Mike
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.