Author: Madhavan
Date: 23:12:08 07/08/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 09, 2005 at 02:07:09, Amir wrote: >On July 09, 2005 at 01:34:07, Graham Banks wrote: > >>On July 09, 2005 at 01:20:42, Amir wrote: >> >>>On July 09, 2005 at 00:03:08, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >>> >>>>On July 08, 2005 at 23:40:52, Amir wrote: >>>> >>>>>On July 08, 2005 at 22:19:04, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>Good evening Pablo. Thanks for the posts. You are improving. good to see you >>>>>>>winning more games and less draws. >>>>>> >>>>>>LOL are you actually buying his crap? >>>>> >>>>>Buying what? Are you claiming the games are fake? If so, post your proof. If >>>>>not, 2 points out of 4 games is better score than Ehlvest's. No wonder Zappa's >>>>>programmer is too scared to play 2000 players who are anti-comp experts and >>>>>instead prefers GMs who have no clue how to play against comps. >>>> >>>>They are fake if they are compared with live game and using long time controls. >>>>That what you don´t realize. The proof is the game are played on chess servers >>>>not in live. The proof is the games are played in blitz times. The proof is that >>>>showing 4 games or just 1 game doesnt prove anything. >>>> >>>>Announcing a big fighting based on this games is called _______. >>> >>>Anthony flat out refused to play Pablo claiming that he has nothing to "gain" >>>from the match, and when Pablo beats Zappa on server you say the games are >>>"played on server." The programmer *refused* to play Pablo. I take that as an >>>indication that Zappa sucks and the programmer is scared. The wins against Zappa >>>on the server confirms that suspicion. >> >>I find your claims laughable. > >What claim? Anthony flat out refused to play him claiming "he has nothing to >gain from the match." That's not a "claim." It's a fact. That was a strange >response, given it's a freeware engine (not commercials program). Why would he >say such thing unless he is afraid Pablo's result might be better than Ehlvest >in the match? again,please refrain from making stupid remarks. you don't know what you are talking about others don't know what you are talking about I don't know what you are talking about moderators dont know what you talking about re-read what Graham actually wrote,it has nothing to do with Anthony refusing to accept the pablo's challenge. Pablo only reports blitz game and results he won and nothing else. Elvhest is better than pablo,look at his fide rating.get it?you snip off everything and always repeat the bunch of nonsense again and again,come on dude :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.