Author: Amir
Date: 23:22:08 07/08/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 09, 2005 at 02:12:08, Madhavan wrote: >>What claim? Anthony flat out refused to play him claiming "he has nothing to >>gain from the match." That's not a "claim." It's a fact. That was a strange >>response, given it's a freeware engine (not commercials program). Why would he >>say such thing unless he is afraid Pablo's result might be better than Ehlvest >>in the match? > >again,please refrain from making stupid remarks. >you don't know what you are talking about >others don't know what you are talking about >I don't know what you are talking about >moderators dont know what you talking about > >re-read what Graham actually wrote,it has nothing to do with Anthony refusing to >accept the pablo's challenge. >Pablo only reports blitz game and results he won and nothing else. >Elvhest is better than pablo,look at his fide rating.get it?you snip off >everything and always repeat the bunch of nonsense again and again,come on dude Your reading comprehension are not so developed, are they? Graham *REPLIED* to *MY* post in which I said Anthony refused to play him claiming "he has nothing to gain from the match." If his or yours response had nothing to do with that, why did he reply to my post? Ehlvest is better than Pablo? Really, Einstein? Wow! You really are the sharpest knife in the kitchen.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.