Author: Madhavan
Date: 03:41:08 07/09/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 09, 2005 at 02:46:47, Amir wrote: >On July 09, 2005 at 02:29:38, Madhavan wrote: > >>On July 09, 2005 at 02:22:08, Amir wrote: >> >>>On July 09, 2005 at 02:12:08, Madhavan wrote: >>> >>> >>>>>What claim? Anthony flat out refused to play him claiming "he has nothing to >>>>>gain from the match." That's not a "claim." It's a fact. That was a strange >>>>>response, given it's a freeware engine (not commercials program). Why would he >>>>>say such thing unless he is afraid Pablo's result might be better than Ehlvest >>>>>in the match? >>>> >>>>again,please refrain from making stupid remarks. >>>>you don't know what you are talking about >>>>others don't know what you are talking about >>>>I don't know what you are talking about >>>>moderators dont know what you talking about >>>> >>>>re-read what Graham actually wrote,it has nothing to do with Anthony refusing to >>>>accept the pablo's challenge. >>>>Pablo only reports blitz game and results he won and nothing else. >>>>Elvhest is better than pablo,look at his fide rating.get it?you snip off >>>>everything and always repeat the bunch of nonsense again and again,come on dude >>> >>>Your reading comprehension are not so developed, are they? Graham *REPLIED* to >>>*MY* post in which I said Anthony refused to play him claiming "he has nothing >>>to gain from the match." >> >>yes,true.because ELVHEST is much better than pablo,therefore he has nothing to >>gain from such a match.so what's your point?you just go around and reply to >>every post supporting pale asking others to give him a chance. > >I took his response to mean that he is afraid Pablo might win or draw some game >and Zappa might end up looking bad. This is the only implication of "I have >nothing to gain from the match." Even if Zappa wins 4-0, the program gains >nothing, but it will look bad even if Pablo wins or draws a single game. In >other words, the programmer is afraid. That's pretty curious behavior from a >free engine (unless he wants to sell Zappa someday). What are the programmer's motives? play higher rated player than a lower rated.no matter what the heck is defined by anti computer chess which doesnt exist. >>he has nothing to gain from a novice player and you,what's your rating,kid? > >I am pretty sure that my 2300+ rating is higher than Pablo's, but that doesn't >mean I would do better against comps than him. Paying good anti-comp chess is a >different skill. you a 2300+,proof out that your rating is 2300. Anti comp chess is hoax,How do the anti comp players know the opening lines of Fritz,Hydra?if the opening line looks unusual and at random spectacular moves? that would leave anti comp players to the ground. >As for you, from you posts and general behavior here, I suspect that you are >either unrated or 1000 to 1400 rated player (at best). you are wrong,you don't know what you are talking about.your rating doesnt exis,and its made up. your posts displays a lot of immaturity,you need to grow up.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.