Author: Arturo Ochoa
Date: 04:37:09 07/09/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 09, 2005 at 01:20:42, Amir wrote: >On July 09, 2005 at 00:03:08, Arturo Ochoa wrote: > >>On July 08, 2005 at 23:40:52, Amir wrote: >> >>>On July 08, 2005 at 22:19:04, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >>> >>>>>Good evening Pablo. Thanks for the posts. You are improving. good to see you >>>>>winning more games and less draws. >>>> >>>>LOL are you actually buying his crap? >>> >>>Buying what? Are you claiming the games are fake? If so, post your proof. If >>>not, 2 points out of 4 games is better score than Ehlvest's. No wonder Zappa's >>>programmer is too scared to play 2000 players who are anti-comp experts and >>>instead prefers GMs who have no clue how to play against comps. >> >>They are fake if they are compared with live game and using long time controls. >>That what you don´t realize. The proof is the game are played on chess servers >>not in live. The proof is the games are played in blitz times. The proof is that >>showing 4 games or just 1 game doesnt prove anything. >> >>Announcing a big fighting based on this games is called _______. > >Anthony flat out refused to play Pablo claiming that he has nothing to "gain" >from the match, and when Pablo beats Zappa on server you say the games are >"played on server." The programmer *refused* to play Pablo. I take that as an >indication that Zappa sucks and the programmer is scared. The wins against Zappa >on the server confirms that suspicion. No. Publishing a game a 3 minutes doesnt prove anything. You dont understand the matter. Of course, why to play on a chess server with a short time set-up. Why to play against somobody which games are doubtful and suspectful. For who can be relevant? Well, perhaps it can be some relevant for my dog at home. :)))
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.