Author: Arturo Ochoa
Date: 04:47:35 07/09/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 09, 2005 at 02:12:08, Madhavan wrote: >On July 09, 2005 at 02:07:09, Amir wrote: > >>On July 09, 2005 at 01:34:07, Graham Banks wrote: >> >>>On July 09, 2005 at 01:20:42, Amir wrote: >>> >>>>On July 09, 2005 at 00:03:08, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >>>> >>>>>On July 08, 2005 at 23:40:52, Amir wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On July 08, 2005 at 22:19:04, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>Good evening Pablo. Thanks for the posts. You are improving. good to see you >>>>>>>>winning more games and less draws. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>LOL are you actually buying his crap? >>>>>> >>>>>>Buying what? Are you claiming the games are fake? If so, post your proof. If >>>>>>not, 2 points out of 4 games is better score than Ehlvest's. No wonder Zappa's >>>>>>programmer is too scared to play 2000 players who are anti-comp experts and >>>>>>instead prefers GMs who have no clue how to play against comps. >>>>> >>>>>They are fake if they are compared with live game and using long time controls. >>>>>That what you don´t realize. The proof is the game are played on chess servers >>>>>not in live. The proof is the games are played in blitz times. The proof is that >>>>>showing 4 games or just 1 game doesnt prove anything. >>>>> >>>>>Announcing a big fighting based on this games is called _______. >>>> >>>>Anthony flat out refused to play Pablo claiming that he has nothing to "gain" >>>>from the match, and when Pablo beats Zappa on server you say the games are >>>>"played on server." The programmer *refused* to play Pablo. I take that as an >>>>indication that Zappa sucks and the programmer is scared. The wins against Zappa >>>>on the server confirms that suspicion. >>> >>>I find your claims laughable. >> >>What claim? Anthony flat out refused to play him claiming "he has nothing to >>gain from the match." That's not a "claim." It's a fact. That was a strange >>response, given it's a freeware engine (not commercials program). Why would he >>say such thing unless he is afraid Pablo's result might be better than Ehlvest >>in the match? > >again,please refrain from making stupid remarks. >you don't know what you are talking about >others don't know what you are talking about >I don't know what you are talking about >moderators dont know what you talking about > >re-read what Graham actually wrote,it has nothing to do with Anthony refusing to >accept the pablo's challenge. >Pablo only reports blitz game and results he won and nothing else. >Elvhest is better than pablo,look at his fide rating.get it?you snip off >everything and always repeat the bunch of nonsense again and again,come on dude >:) Mmm Amir, Madhavan and Swammi, all of the them seems to be the same person, part of the same science fiction story. I also find your claims very laughable. :) Believe me it is too funny to be serious. :))))
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.