Author: Christos Gitsis
Date: 05:39:27 07/09/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 09, 2005 at 07:07:23, Roman Hartmann wrote:
>On July 09, 2005 at 00:03:08, Arturo Ochoa wrote:
>
>>On July 08, 2005 at 23:40:52, Amir wrote:
>>
>>>On July 08, 2005 at 22:19:04, Jonas Cohonas wrote:
>>>
>>>>>Good evening Pablo. Thanks for the posts. You are improving. good to see you
>>>>>winning more games and less draws.
>>>>
>>>>LOL are you actually buying his crap?
>>>
>>>Buying what? Are you claiming the games are fake? If so, post your proof. If
>>>not, 2 points out of 4 games is better score than Ehlvest's. No wonder Zappa's
>>>programmer is too scared to play 2000 players who are anti-comp experts and
>>>instead prefers GMs who have no clue how to play against comps.
>>
>>They are fake if they are compared with live game and using long time controls.
>>That what you don´t realize. The proof is the game are played on chess servers
>>not in live. The proof is the games are played in blitz times. The proof is that
>>showing 4 games or just 1 game doesnt prove anything.
>>
>>Announcing a big fighting based on this games is called _______.
>
>I don't think these games are fake as I followed several games Pablo played on
>the chessbase server. I certainly agree that the games look often a bit the
>same, closing the position and then only shuffling the rooks or king a bit
>around trying to win on time. Rather boring to watch, true, but then it works
>against a lot of engines.
>Playing longer games won't be that easy for Pablo though, not because he can't
>beat the engines in longer time controls, but rather because no one wants to
>play him in longer time controls on the servers. The result would be about the
>same anyway. In fact it might be even easier to win games in longer time
>controls for Pablo. A few weeks ago I kibitzed a game he played against Hydra
>(game below) which was dead draw but then he overlooked a simple fork and lost
>the game (doubt he would have overlooked that fork in a longer time control).
>
>regards
>Roman
>
>[Event "10m + 10s, rated"]
>[Site "playchess.com"]
>[Date "2005.06.28"]
>[Round "?"]
>[White "Ares01, Hydra/Scylla-1.06bC"]
>[Black "Father"]
>[Result "1-0"]
>[ECO "C84"]
>[WhiteElo "2873"]
>[BlackElo "2249"]
>[Annotator "Hartmann,Roman"]
>[PlyCount "90"]
>[EventDate "2005.02.04"]
>[EventType "rapid"]
>
>1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5.
>O-O b5 6. Bb3 Be7 7. d4 d6 8. dxe5 Nxe5 9.
>Nxe5 dxe5 10. Qxd8+ Bxd8 11. a4 c6 12. Be3 O-O 13. Rd1 Be7 14. axb5 cxb5 15. Nc3
>Bb7 16. f3
>Rfd8 17. Kf2 Kf8 18. g4 Rxd1 19. Rxd1 Rd8
>20. Rxd8+ Bxd8 21. Ke2 Nd7 22. Nd5 g5 23. c4
>bxc4 24. Bxc4 h6 25. Bf2 f6 26. b3 Ba5 27.
>h4 Ke8 28. h5 Kd8 29. Be3 Ke8 30. Kd1 Kd8
>31. Kc2 Ke8 32. Bf2 Kd8 33. Bd3 Ke8 34. Kb2 Bd2
>35. Bxa6 Bxd5 36. exd5 Bb4 37. Kc2 Nc5 38.
>Bxc5 Bxc5 39. Kd3 Ke7 40. Ke4 Kd6 41. Kf5 Ke7
>42. Kg6 Bd6 43. Kxh6 Kf7 44. Bc8 Be7 45. Be6+
>Kf8 {Father resigns} 1-0
Hello Roman,
This was really a good game by Pablo. I think he came closer to the draw in this
game than Adams did in any of his games with black against Hydra.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.