Author: Juan Pablo Naar C.
Date: 11:23:15 07/11/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 10, 2005 at 22:34:03, Pablo Ignacio Restrepo wrote:
>On July 10, 2005 at 22:04:56, Juan Pablo Naar C. wrote:
>
>>On July 10, 2005 at 21:40:28, Pablo Ignacio Restrepo wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>Anthony.
>>>
>>>I have been very busy the last days.
>>>
>>> For that reason I have not answer your post, "where you have insulted to me
>>>before."
>>>
>>>My answer will be very simple. "I am not going to make any insult against you",
>>>and I am going to continue playing engines until my God get to me, energy, life,
>>>and opportunity. The “resigns word” doesn’t exist in my life.
>>>
>>>I was reading other post where, Fernando Villegas ("Thanks Fernando") wrote some
>>>ideas. .......... Now, Anthony when you answer to Fernando you tell
>>>there,....... "Pablo asked for a match, I declined, and then ..............“he
>>>spends 5 hours bitching at the ICC live broadcast” about how I'm ducking him.
>>>That is why I'm so annoyed."
>>>
>>>Anthony........... This is absolute false.!!!!
>>>
>>> I am not in ICC; I want to be sincere. I don’t like ICC.
>>>
>>>ICC in my last account banned to me, because I was playing antichess, my own
>>>style, and beating engines!! type Pablo-Restrepo, Mar 16-2005/2011.
>>>
>>>If you want to go to ICC it is your business. I respect to ICC, but I want to be
>>>sincere in other direction too: You are going to find there a great fortress,
>>>where they are going to protect your ego, banning guys like me that know how to
>>>play a perfect antichess, but your prize will be that you are not going to be
>>>better.
>>>
>>>This is the more important difference in computer atmosphere between ICC and
>>>play chess. Playchess, have got to me the opportunity and got to many other
>>>human beings better than me, to play against engines. All the time I have want
>>>into engines room. Now I have played more of 6.000 games against engines into
>>>playchess.
>>>
>>>There are many smart people into playchess. For me the smartest are Hydra Team.
>>>
>>>Do you know why? Because the have the humility to recognize the mistakes of
>>>Hydra, making the engine better and better all the days. Last year I won 2 times
>>>and make several draws against Hydra in 60+15 time control, and 40,000 Kilo
>>>nodes each second. Now in 2.005, In my last games, I have not been capable to
>>>drunk the great Hydra, and I have had just 2 draws in 10+10 and 70.000 to
>>>115,000 Kilo nodes per second before the Challenger Vs G.M. Michael Adams.
>>>
>>>There is a simple important question..……………………………………. Why Hydra has invited to
>>>me or has accepted to play chess against me, a simple amateur?
>>>
>>>Remember, I don’t have any title, I don’t have Fide ego, I am not a master, I
>>>don’t have a P.H.D., I don’t have teams for marketing, for news tactics, etc
>>>(all the things that make the power). The answer is simple, because they wants
>>>to make the best engine, and now they not only have the best engine, they have
>>>the more important chess player in the chess history, better than Gary Kasparov.
>>>
>>>I want to be sincere in other way……………... It is truth that I don’t have any
>>>title, or high studies, but I have been studying engines by myself 25 years,
>>>since chess challenger # 7 in 1980.
>>>
>>>Since 1999 more or less playing 6 hours per day………...what I want to say, it is
>>>that in the life a P.H.D. is very important, and will be the best that any human
>>>being of the Earth planet could being P.H.D. Maybe the Earth will be better (or
>>>worst), But not... ………………..
>>>
>>>You can be sure that a P.H.D. or a title, by itself don’t have the power to open
>>>the door of the sky, or to close the back door of the zappa fortress.
>>>
>>>Now ..... How could an engine beat to me? ,,,,,,, The answer is simple..... Just
>>>to put 10% more value to my own pawns...It is all .....
>>>
>>>But the problem is very very more complicate..... Look.…………..All the engines are
>>>walking by a knife, fighting for get the great Word Chess Computer Champion. In
>>>that way, everyone must have a competitive parameters. Now, the great Job from
>>>Omega-13 from playchess, Derek Paquette, with his antifather book, has been
>>>really good, the same that "black watch" has implemented against me... but it is
>>>a not competitive book in Man Vs Machine Top Challengers. Did you understand?
>>>
>>>If you want to make to me a check matte, must to build and put into the
>>>marketing engines anti father. Look!! This is ridiculous.
>>>
>>>The problem to continue..... When all the engines are turning onn, are they
>>>going to be into a standard and principal antifather parameters or book? No!!
>>>and of course, when the "fathers"(all the antichess players of the Earth) will
>>>be challenger, are they going to make permission to change the parameters for
>>>antihuman parameters, for the sponsors? Of course not.
>>>
>>>Look .,.....just like a dream .... If you to accept a challenger against me, and
>>>change the parameters to destroy to me, you are going to win....
>>>repeat,”you”………….....but not “zappa.” Because zappa will be playing a mixed
>>>parameters, the human instructions, more, its all-high power.
>>>
>>>I know many more things about engines, like for example, that if I could play
>>>hydra at home every day, in minus of a mount hydra will be in several troubles.
>>>But I am, not going to make this never, I am to continue just playing engines
>>>until the second, minute, day, and time that God get to me the opportunity.
>>>
>>>I challenger you, ICC, chess computer programmers, of all square of the Earth,
>>>to build and engine, that beat for ever the antialgorithm style, the antichess,
>>>the unique way to beat the engines.
>>
>>Well, if you study really hard and dedicated the "antichess anti-algorithm",
>>(and your games :-)) you could "teach" an engine when the opponent is playing it
>>and how to counter-attack it by adding extra knowledge, that is not a problem,
>>but perhaps a challenge.
>>
>>>
>>> Like the Top G.M. Lasker said. “You must to study your opponent.” In that
>>>way, only the human beings that will be studding the algorithm of the engines,
>>>could will have a chance to win them.
>>>
>>>If the V.I.P want to play engines in the Orthodoxies lines, it is ok, it is the
>>>business of everyone, very respectable. The G.M. Michael Adams is one of the
>>>seven best chess players of the Earth. He has played against Hydra as a warrior,
>>>with much courage, but with an arc.
>>>
>>>My position in the table is not strong. I will be very happy if some day I could
>>>play a challenger in live against a G.M., anonimus match. Not news. Never in my
>>>life I have had that opportunity. I will be very happy If I could play a
>>>challenger against your engine in the exactly parameters that have played G.M.
>>>Elvesth, and against the exactly conditions that G.M. Adams played Hydra,
>>>against Hydra. Of course with vigilance in every side of the combat, for have
>>>safe that none has human or computer assistance.
>>>
>>>You have said that I am a "moron". Don’t worry, I am not going to be more or
>>>minus smart because the people say to me one or a million of things. My new
>>>challenger is now different. Me(the moron), challenger to you(the P.H.D.) to
>>>build and engine (ZAPPA), that avoid my general strategy. I am just to wait some
>>>time, to save that engine from the web, and to discover if the P.H.D. is
>>>stronger that the MORON.
>>>
>>>With all respect for you and everyone in the chess computer community,
>>>
>>>Pablo
>>>Note 1.
>>> If anyone tell to me today…… What is the state of art in the battle man vs.
>>>machine, my answer will be:
>>>For now… game over. Human beings 0, engines 1.
>>
>>Hey Pablo, eres de Colombia? (Vi tu bandera en playchess). Si es asi, estoy
>>feliz de er un compañero de mi pais en esta comunidad :-)
>
>Hola Juan Pablo.
>Si lo soy. Cual es tu nickname en playchess.?
>Saludos,
>Pablo
Mi nickname es TheMachine en playchess. En donde vives? Soy de Barranquilla,
quiza me podrias enseñar algunos trucos del antichess :-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.