Author: Madhavan
Date: 21:44:15 07/11/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 11, 2005 at 10:23:11, Mridul Muralidharan wrote: > > This is not CTF - posts here are 'supposed' to be about Computer chess ... >there might be a few offtopic posts , but usually by people who regularly >contribute to computer chess. >I think you are mixing up URL's , you should be visiting CTF more and CCC less. > > Giving half a dozen names out of the five hundred odd active readers (just a >wild guess) who happened to "attack you illegally" is plain stupid (wth does >that mean anyway ?) >Also , this thread was about zappa and Arturo is far more relevent to Zappa than >you are. If you dont like his responses , dont continue reading or posting ! >After all , Arturo is _part_ of the team and you are not and you are not really >making any useful suggestions or observations. >Answers which you dont like are not "attacks" , dont be childish. > >You dont see someone non-technical going into a doctor's seminar and spewing >nonsense do you ? What you are doing is kind of along the same lines (dont take >me literrally here). > >Under normal circumstances , I wont bother replying to trolls like you - just >tend to skip your posts (dont feel bad , you are not alone in my list. I have >not seen any valuable contribution from you thats all - and I dont have too much >spare time to waste. a troll?How nice of you,thanks >If you do start making useful contribution , you will earn >>respect of many others here too). >Arturo happens to be a personal friend and your posts were definitely >unwarrented attacks - especially considering what he has done and what little >you have. >Ofcourse , he does not need me to chine in :) But that is besides the point. > > >Now , I hope you dont take this as a "illegal attack" on you - just pointing out >the obvious. > >- Mridul > >PS : And no , I wont be posting more on this - way too much spam has been >generated on this topic. > >On July 10, 2005 at 23:15:22, Madhavan wrote: > >>On July 09, 2005 at 23:29:26, Mridul Muralidharan wrote: >> >>> >>><snip> >>>On July 09, 2005 at 12:55:54, Madhavan wrote: >>> >>>>On July 09, 2005 at 11:05:36, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>>Well. I cannot take him serius. I saw one game of him and I realized it is a >>>>>waste of time for me and Anthony Cozzie. >>>> >>>>For you?Do you get money from Anthony?guess not.you have nothing to do with >>>>zappa,infact you seem to be useless zappa's bug >>> >>>Madhavan, >>> Do you have any idea whom you are talking to ? >>>As Arturo would have already explained to you , he was the booker for Zappa in >>>CCT7 , and now in this tourny. >>>He was the booker of diep for much longer before that. >>>From what I can see , his contribution to computer chess has been significantly >>>much higher than yours (maybe forever ?) and for much longer - yours till date >>>has been ... ZERO. >>> >>> If you would be a responsible user , you will "help" the >>>programmer/booker/related people with constructive criticism - like most other >>>here ... post positions , analysis , etc. >>> I dont see much of a contribution from you to all this - be thankful to the >>>people who donate their freetime so that people like you can have the pleasure >>>of enjoying their hardwork for free : be it the software itself , the related >>>books/EG tables/etc or the tourny's that they organise. >> >>I just download stuffs here,I haven't been in a fight with anyone except that >>those who start attacking me in the first place, >>Didn't Arturo attack me illegally? >>Didn't Guenther attack me illegally? >> >>You really need to know what's going on instead of just skipping others post and >>opening my sub thread and complaining nonsensically >> >>there were others who don't attack me,I have made many friends here in CTF,If >>your point is that I should also contribute to computer chess,Can't you ask some >>medical guy or medical doctor to do some contribution to comp chess?obvious >>illogic you have yourtself. >> >>Everybody here knows who the guenther is and who the arturo is,they have gone >>nuts. >> >>I'm not using any of Arturo's opening book.I have my fritz 8 software,nor do i >>need any contribution,okay? >> >>Did you check my old messages like "WCCC participants"what happened to that >>thread?Guenther the well known troll appeard and spoiled. >> >>and the same goes in this thread too,Arturo started first attacking me >>illegally,where were you? >> >> >>>Most regular/oldtimers here are too polite to mention this to you ,but I have >>>been seeing people like you trolling way too much recently : especially of >>>matters that are not directly relevent to you , or concern you too much. >>> Technical spats are different from trolling - people continue to respect the >>>other whom they disagree with on technical matters. >>> >>>Please stop wasting time and the bandwidth of the board with unnecessary posts >>>like this. >>> >>>- Mridul >>> >>>> >>>>> A rapid game doesnt tell me anything >>>>>about holes and horrors that the program might have. >>>>> >>>>>I doubt that this Pablo can play a live game with long time controls. Sorry, the >>>>>reality tells me that it is not enough to show rapid or bullet games to prove a >>>>>doubtful theory. For fun is Ok, to take him serious is other thing. >>>>> >>>>>Arturo.-
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.