Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 22:42:48 07/12/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 12, 2005 at 16:56:57, Graham Banks wrote:
>On July 12, 2005 at 16:33:52, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>> Hi Jason
>> The longer you play the more will the score of
>> all CM10k settings drop (under 50 %). I am quite
>> sure that no setting of The King 3.33 will have
>> a chance to win a match over 50 games against
>> Shredder 9.
>> Kurt
>
>
>I agree, but I really appreciate what Jason is doing.
>
>Two other things to take into account are:
>
>-most CM9000 or CM10th settings that have a high control of centre value will do
>quite well against Shredder
>-the settings that do best against Shredder are not necessarily the best
>settings overall because they perform differently against other programs.
Hi Graham
That's indeed a great (the greatest) problem with CM-settings
and the reason why I have stopped creating own settings for
CM10k. My feeling is that it's much more difficult to find a
good overall setting for CM10k than with CM9k.
Kurt
>
>However Jason has had good success coming up with some decent CM9000 and CM10th
>settings using his method of testing against the best (Shredder), so I'm not
>pooh-poohing what he's doing at all. I find it quite interesting to follow.
>
>Graham.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.