Author: Graham Banks
Date: 23:50:20 07/12/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 13, 2005 at 01:42:48, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On July 12, 2005 at 16:56:57, Graham Banks wrote: > >>On July 12, 2005 at 16:33:52, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >> >>> Hi Jason >>> The longer you play the more will the score of >>> all CM10k settings drop (under 50 %). I am quite >>> sure that no setting of The King 3.33 will have >>> a chance to win a match over 50 games against >>> Shredder 9. >>> Kurt >> >> >>I agree, but I really appreciate what Jason is doing. >> >>Two other things to take into account are: >> >>-most CM9000 or CM10th settings that have a high control of centre value will do >>quite well against Shredder >>-the settings that do best against Shredder are not necessarily the best >>settings overall because they perform differently against other programs. > > Hi Graham > That's indeed a great (the greatest) problem with CM-settings > and the reason why I have stopped creating own settings for > CM10k. My feeling is that it's much more difficult to find a > good overall setting for CM10k than with CM9k. > Kurt >> This is why Ray's testing should be useful. He's testing a variety of CM10th settings against other top programs. 280 games each (40 game matches at 40 moves in 40 mins repeating against Shredder 9, Fritz 8 Bilbao, Junior 9, Hiarcs 9, Ruffian 2.1.0, Gandalf 6.0, Aristarch 4.50. Graham. >>However Jason has had good success coming up with some decent CM9000 and CM10th >>settings using his method of testing against the best (Shredder), so I'm not >>pooh-poohing what he's doing at all. I find it quite interesting to follow. >> >>Graham.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.